After the floodgates were opened for 12 hours, the entries poured over, and the results gathered, it's time to post up the finale of the No-Bullshit critique event.

Writers were offered an opportunity to submit their work to be critiqued by two of the Literature Gallery Directors, ^imperfect and ^PoeticWar. When the time to submit ended, they got straight to work delving into the poetry and making their no-nonsense suggestions. The results of which have been uploaded, for your convience, to PDF form which can be read right here.

Now, for those who have submitted, make sure to read this carefully:

The critics will NOT be responding to any objections or questions you may have involving their criticism on your piece. You are, however, encouraged to discuss the results and comment on the article. Just do not expect justification or follow-ups on your specific piece.

You should be mindful of what you take from this session. By no means is this critique meant to be taken as gospel, or everything that is said to be followed to the letter. That also does not mean you should ignore anything that doesn't please you. It's important to look at what is said and to investigate your own work and decide, for yourself, what to take away from all this.

As well, for the possibility of future critique sessions, please check out this poll and vote to decide the fate of this particular feature.