In this increasingly digital age, film is now beginning to meet its match. We're seeing improved image sensors on ultra-high end professional camera rigs, and beginning to see quality on the scale of todays medium format and large format cameras. Not to mention the ease of use and convenience of digital. Does this sound the death knell for film photography as we know it?
After reading many articles on the subject and seeing various works in my time here on dA, I'm inclined to say that film photography has its place, and it's definitely here to stay for the foreseeable future. There are many areas of photography where digital is just not up to snuff with film images. Street photography for one, digital point-and-shoot cameras don't come close to delivering what a quality rangefinder can, and good luck trying to capture your close-in street scene with a bulky dSLR. While digital has taken over fashion photography, nature, and especially experimental photography I still see as bastions of film.
As a film photographer myself, albeit one with a limited budget, digital is not something I can afford in the short run, while it may have a lower "cost of ownership" in the long run. I definitely understand why people go digital, you don't have to screw around with film, you don't have to wait for developing or do it yourself, and you can take as many photos as you like, discarding the rest. However, the aforementioned things are what keep me coming back to film, not to mention the investment I've already made in film equipment.
For me, it's the thrill of clicking the shutter and knowing that you've taken a great picture, then waiting for the processed print or negative to confirm that feeling. It's knowing what film will give you the results you want, and what you can get away with before you exceed the limitations of your equipment or yourself. It's about seeing the picture, and taking it, never looking back.
I've gathered some samples of film photography from several participants in a thumbshare post I made specifically for this purpose. Hope you enjoy.
Devious Comments
--
"Orwell was right, we're all gonna be targets" ~Greg Sage
"You know how dumb the average person is? Well, by definition, half of 'em are even dumber than THAT." ~J.R. "Bob" Dobbs
Your selections are good too. Film is a good starting point. Every mistake you make will cost you. So you strive to get better shots.
--
Getting the shit out takes ALOT of hard work.
You still end up with shit.
I'm not sure if you're counting nature as film or digital but I think most nature photographers tend to use DSLRs now. The option of changing ISO and the ability to go out in the field with a few 16gb cards can make all the difference.
--
Beards not bombs.
--
Last.fm
--
le gallery: [link]
I almost completely share your opinion and I would like to say that this report stimulated me to go back to using film, along with digital. I think we indeed start getting "careless" when we stay away from film for too long.
--
Some men see things as they are and say, "Why?" I dream of things that never were and say, "Why not?"
All photos are hand taken, developed, and printed by me
--
"Fall down again, Bella?"
"No, Emmett. I punched a werewolf in the face."
Previous Page12345... Next Page