deviant ART

[x]

Notices



Advertisement



More Editorials

Artistic Nudes - A study by Fahd A. Paracha

=fahap:iconfahap: reports, 22h 14m ago
Depictions of nudity refers to nudity in all the artistic disciplines including vernacular and historical depictions. Nudity in art has generally conformed — with some variation — to social standards for public nudity; in cultures where nudity was accepted, nude figures in painting and sculpture were as well.

New report system puts FAQ into question.

=Mixedpie:iconMixedpie: reports, 1d 15h ago
FAQs #565 and #305 are called into question as new report system shows pornographic materials ok'd by the administration.

Dangerous Pictures - UK Criminal Justice Bill

$chix0r:iconchix0r: reports, May 9
The UK Government have introduced a Criminal Justice & Immigration Bill to criminalise the possession of adult, staged, consensual violent pornography. How will this affect you?

The Wonderful World of Color

*celestiadevs:iconcelestiadevs: reports, May 8
A look into deviations using complimentary, contrasting, and monochrome colors.
24 comments   Editorials  Last +fav: =fahap

A better way to organize deviations?

*Orioto:iconOrioto: reports, May 7
The actual way of organizing content is somewhat not perfect, cause it links two things that should be independant : genre and tech of an image.
76 comments   Editorials  Last +fav: ~kyuNee

The World is Black and White

*celestiadevs:iconcelestiadevs: reports, May 4
An exploration of black and white works with a focus on ink, as well as some tips and tricks to creating works of art using only black and white.

Dear deviantART,

`red5:iconred5: reports, May 2
I have recently been becoming concerned with a growing demographic on deviantART. "Fanboys".
43 comments   Editorials  Last +fav: *Arica

Constructive critique: learning to talk..

^Obsidian-Fox:iconObsidian-Fox: reports, May 2
Taking a look at what is an appropriate comment, what qualifies as critique, and some helpful spelling/grammar tips I learned in grade one.

Fast fact reference: Lyme Disease

*ItDoesNotHaveMe:iconItDoesNotHaveMe: reports, May 1
May is Lyme Disease Awareness Month, worldwide! In light of this is a series of articles with important information regarding this potentially debilitating, silent illness.

Animal Cruelty: Art or Insanity?

=PsychoGlitch:iconPsychoGlitch: reports, April 27
An animal abuser won first place in an art show by starving a dog to death.

Editorials This Week

New report system puts FAQ into question.

=Mixedpie:iconMixedpie: reports, 1d 15h ago
FAQs #565 and #305 are called into question as new report system shows pornographic materials ok'd by the administration.

Artistic Nudes - A study by Fahd A. Paracha

=fahap:iconfahap: reports, 22h 14m ago
Depictions of nudity refers to nudity in all the artistic disciplines including vernacular and historical depictions. Nudity in art has generally conformed — with some variation — to social standards for public nudity; in cultures where nudity was accepted, nude figures in painting and sculpture were as well.
24 comments   Editorials  Last +fav: *Gildir

Cutters

=ShiraAriel:iconShiraAriel: reports, May 11
"It is estimated that depression affects as many as one in eight adolescents." -[link]

This is my story. My thoughts on the issue.

Interview With Spyroteknik

~Critique-Central:iconCritique-Central: reports, May 10
Interview With Spyroteknik

deviantART's Mature Content Hypocrisy

*sephys-little-cloud:iconsephys-little-cloud: reports, 14h 21m ago
Why does the deviantART staff refuse to enforce their own rules sometimes? When it comes to prohibited content such as pornography and underage nudity, why do they let some obscene material stay up, while innocent deviations get deleted?
9 comments   Editorials  Last +fav: ~Ixupi

PETA and IAMS

*thegratefulred:iconthegratefulred: reports, 1d 19h ago
PETA PROTESTS IAMS’ DEADLY ANIMAL TESTS AT COMPANY’S SUPERDOGS SHOW IN WASHINGTON

OJ Simpson confesses?!

=sirniqman:iconsirniqman: reports, 1d 9h ago
OJ Confesses finally.

Toddler's body removed from mineshaft

~MizzSugaK:iconMizzSugaK: reports, May 9
This Poor Boy, i hope the Police find his killer.

E – The Environmental Magazine

~tacomeme2007:icontacomeme2007: reports, 2d 8h ago
You'll read things in E that you won't find anywhere else...

Think about it...
EPA researchers estimate the air inside our homes and offices is two to five times more polluted than the outside air. Considering most of us spend more time indoors then out and breath some 30 pounds of air per day, that's a big cause for concern.

It's a fact...
Underwater "windmills" (or tidal turbines) are tapping the tidal flow of New York City's East River as part of an important first step in harnessing ocean tides to create pollution-free electricity in the United States. Tidal power plants are also now operating in France, Russia, and Canada.

Paradoxically...
The wine industry's switch to synthetic corks and screw caps has the Rainforest Alliance up in arms. The concern is that forests of cork trees will decline because tearing the cork off the trees' bark actually stimulates the growth of the forest.

New research shows...
That hundreds of chemicals affect women's health more adversely than men's. And many of these toxic chemicals are found in products women use every day. Autoimmune diseases, Alzheimer's disease, certain cancers and osteoporosis are all more prevalent in women than in men due to exposure to these widely used chemicals.

Reading E will help you...

* Maintain a healthy home and a planet-friendly car
* Go organic and avoid genetically modified foods
* Make wise, environmentally responsible investments
* Use personal care products free of harmful chemicals
* Live the green lifestyle and be a force for change

Editorials


How to deal with Ripped Art.

*killjoy:iconkilljoy: reports, Jul 30, 2007
Art "Ripping" or Theft.

I'm going to review the details of the then and now of art ripping, how it's done and how to combat it, before and after it has been stolen.

The purpose of this article is to help people who are frustrated with spotting their own and other's art work places on the web it does not belong. A crucial step in combating this is understanding it, so we'll go through the details!


Art Theft in History
Traditional Art Theft had two forms.. straight up stealing the actual art piece, from private or museum collections and selling them black market, to reproducing them. Reproduction of physical (not digital) art is an art form in and of its own right, and in many ways requires a greater technical knowledge and mastery of art then the very artist being copied may have. Properly duplicating art is a painstaking process involving a multitude of steps, from identifying the actual makeup of the paints used (their chemical breakdowns, sources, etc.) obtaining replicas or originals of the inks and materials (canvas, etc.) utilizing the same brush sizes and makes as the original artist (and other tools) replicating their specific color mixing and ink layering techniques, brush stroke techniques, pressure applications.. you can see where this is going! The masters of art duplication are respected professionals and can reproduce any art piece in existence so perfectly that not even chemical analysis can separate the original from the duplication (they even have methods for accelerated aging, fading and cracking methods.)

Art Theft Now: Digital Thievery
Today, art is stolen digitally. All art forms get lifted (stolen) by computer very easily and for a multitude of reasons. The biggest is ego, people want to be seen as accomplished, creative, and intelligent; the means to reaching this fast is generally by lifting the work of other people who portray artistic sensibilities and stylings that the thief wishes to have. These are the hardest thieves to combat, since they generally do not profit from their thievery in any monetary way, are often underage, and generally just have no motive or common decency that would make them bend to threats (we'll tackle some methods that can be effective against them later.)
As well, websites that sell subscriptions to access "premium" digital art are now cropping up and offering art from 'contributors' who have, well, no clue they're contributing to begin with. These are easier to work against if they speak a language you do too.
Similar to above are sites offering printed artwork that lift the work from other places without paying the actual artist. These can be very hard to deal with as they do not have a need to remove signatures from the art before selling it, since that's part of the art piece anyways!

How It's Done
Well, there's only three things a person needs to steal art; a right mouse button, a print screen key, or a screengrab tool. Between these three, there is absolutely no way to hide art from a thief. Beyond this, there are more advanced methods of pulling art at higher resolutions from Flash files and websites, attempts to use CSS code to "hide" the image from the right mouse key's context menu.. etc. Basically, I can personally get any image off a file or webpage put on my screen, and if I can do it, any art thief can do it, and probably faster.

The Useless Fight
There is no way to stop someone from being able to get a file off a webpage and on to their hard drive (technically they do it the moment they load the page, at the very least, it enters their RAM.) Ask the professionals who've been trying to combat this for ages.. Flickr, Google/YouTube, Break.com, etcetera.. there's just no stopping a determined kid and his computer.
Basically, don't expect DeviantART or any other website that might host your art to do much outside their legal obligations to protect your art from theft. (their legal obligation is to notify of copyright status, that's all.) Your art is your own problem, and if you care about it, you'll combat ripping yourself, or learn to deal with it. (I just deal with it, personally.)

Stopping Thieves before they Steal
Despite the above, there are a few ways to discourage a ripper. They are sometimes effective, and sometimes they aren't. It's a hit and miss thing and depends on your personal taste in how you present your art for public viewing and how worried you are about some little sprat claiming your work as his own to his friends. (I'm using the masculine 'his' as a generic, girls have art stolen and steal art too!)
Watermarks suck. Sorry, they really do. It is a difficult, win/lose activity to use a watermark, and if you even so much as send your art to one person without the watermark, you've rendered it useless, since that one person can easily spread the unmarked piece out in to the web by sharing it with their friends.. and you see where this goes. The major Pro to using a watermark is its impossible to miss, and nearly as hard to remove. They become part of the art and only the best skilled photomanippers have the skills to remove them effectively (if you no someone who alters images for magazines, that's the kinda person who can do it.) The cons are lengthy; improper placement, size and opacity (transparency) of a watermark can either make it useless or strongly hinder an art piece's ability to garner respect from its audience. Arbitrarily slapping watermarks down the center turn off almost all viewers of the art, and they're quick to move on and find another artist with a similar style who has a less possessive streak.
Hidden Text/Images one can hide text in the code of a JPEG file. The win here is no one suspects it. The lose is anytime the file is resaved from an art application, or is screen captured, the text is lost. I suggest doing this to source files, that way you always have your name on your originals. (do it the easy way, in the file properties.)
Signatures signatures throw off a few people, and in many art forms its just standard practice to have a signature on art. I strongly recommend using a stylized signature, not just some text on the corner or bordering of the image. If should fit in to the image someplace and should be unique to you, sorta like your full name or fingerprint is. (I played with signatures on my art but gave it up, personally.)

Getting Thieves After They Lifted the Art.
For me, this is the best method. Art is always going to get stolen, so we need to keep our eyes open for our work (and other's) and know what to do to get it taken down. Now, for a few methods that prove effective.
Know Where it Came From! if you're going to report art rips on DeviantART itself, know where the original is, or at least someplace that credits the original artist. If you can toss this sort of info in to a rip report, it makes the rip report more credible and more likely to be completed in a timely fashion (and well, completed at all.) Handy Hint: if its famous art, art.com has just about everything by respected artists and photographers that exists and categorizes by style, artist, and can be searched by partial titles, etc. wikipedia.org can also be handy if you know the original title or artist in helping find a website that credits them to the specific piece (one can use wikipedia itself if the art piece has its own article or is present on the artist's wiki entry.)
Be Aggressive with the Rippers. believe it or not, you don't need to profit monetarily (money) to be prosecuted for stealing art! Representing an art piece as your own when it isn't is an act which can be prosecuted in many countries, and can carry some mean punitive fines in the right circumstances. Age also will not protect the art thief, some countries will try minors as adults, or shift financial responsibility for the minor's acts to their parents (and when I got arrested as a kid, let me tell you, having to face my dad after he got the fine was a lot scarier then having to pay it myself has ever been, and I've paid some stiff fines in my day!) Don't be afraid to act like you know more then they do.. you probably do, or can at least BS your way through it.
Send Them a Warning, Then a Bill. email the ripper a warning, or the website hosting the rip, notifying them that the rip has been spotted and that it should be taken down otherwise further actions to have it taken down will be taken. Give them 30 days to respond. No response? Send them a bill, a reasonable bill! Find out what the average running rate on the art piece might be in terms of royalty (if they're selling it, or have used it on a commercial piece) do the math on a reasonable estimate of how many copies might have been made or may possibly be purchased, and put it all in invoice form in a word document and email it with a firm demand of payment (no cussing, that makes you appear juvenile, and will get all your efforts to have the art removed ignored.) usually, an estimate between $500 and $5,000 (USD) is enough to spook them and still sound justifiable in small claims courts.
The Next Level Ignore them! and go to the company that hosts their 'art'. If this is another art community (a website they don't run themselves, such as DeviantART) then send them a notification of the rip, a link to the original with proper credits, or offer to provide proof that you are the original artist, and demand prompt removal. Most of these communities act quick (deviantART being an exception, as reactions can be slow given the size of the community.) and will remove the art, and possibly the 'artist' themselves (ban time!) If it's a personal site, go to their host and approach them the same way that you would an art community. They will demand the person removes it, and often will suspend their website or cancel it depending on how they react. Hosts hate liability, and they can be held liable in a lawsuit if you contact them first and nothing happens between notification to them and a later court date. (deviantART can even be held liable if such proper emails are sent to them and the reasonable time span according to US/California law is allowed to pass between initial contact and the filing of a dispute with the courts. This is generally regarded as 30 days, but 60 days looks even better to a judge. Again, despite what any contract lawyer will say, terms of service that 'offload' liability are bogus and are not honored in court whatsoever, so if the art is on a website or hosting company with such a liability waiver, ignore it, they can still be named and held partially responsible in court.)
Find out who they really are. If possible, find out their real name and address, and start in with the certified mail. The content should be typed on plain white paper and mailed in plain white envelopes (if you want to scare them, add a blank blue outer sheet around the invoice, request, etc. this looks legal but is not an illegal act of impersonation when used all alone.) don't be afraid to send copies to the websites and web hosts as well, physical mail looks even better in court, and the only proof is a copy and a certified or guaranteed delivery receipt from the post office. (certified is best, it gives everything an air of professionalism that can be critical in these situations.) Helpful (fun!) Hint: if they own a domain, do a WHOIS search using either whois.net or networksolutions.com/whois (or another, depending on if they have a country specific .xx/.xxx not only will this often give you their name and mailing address, but their phone number. Use this at your own discretion and means, I'm not endorsing harassment as that can actually get you in to legal trouble!)
Save Your Sources every source file you make, PSD, PNG.. etc.. keep them all. If you really love your art, rip CDRs or DVDRs of your stuff Quarterly or Annually and mail it to yourself. ( I recommend three separate copies, certified) and don't freaking open them for anything! These are "poor man's copyrights" and are time tested methods of providing proof in court. I personally even go so far as saving major "version" changes to separate psd, png and pdf files (and some word docs since I write too) that way there isn't just the latest version, but the whole history to provide particularly convincing proof.
Hidden Signatures Hide signatures in the artwork by incorporating a unique, stylized signature somewhere in each art piece. The idea of these is they are hard to spot unless they're pointed out, and make great court room dramatics when you ask them to identify the signature, and they fail to do so when you can.

Other's Artwork Ripped?
Well, tell them so! They either are already well practiced in the art of combating theft, have retained a lawyer for such purposes in the case of professional, successful artists, etc. some don't really care, too. (I used to get all huffy, but now I fall in 'don't really care';) Don't expect much more then a quick little thanks for the notice though, these are artists after all, and some have pretty weird personalities!

In Conclusion
Be prepared to be ripped, it happens to almost every artist as they improve their style and skills. Its best to be calm, collected and patient; removing rips can be a time consuming process that takes anywhere from weeks to months, and legally, rippers have those months to remove their stolen wares (though, if they're profiting, they are liable to pay you for past sales and sales up until the removal of the rip or the sealing of a deal to get you proper payment on the work. Tell them that in all communications, too!)
So, go out, catch some rippers, and have a little fun doing it too! These people can be very fun to mess with, just remember that when you're talking to them, always seem professional and sure of yourself, and don't be afraid to pay for a little paper and stamps!

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 1 1 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

`1arcticfox:icon1arcticfox: Jul 30, 2007, 7:29:53 PM
I just spent an entire day reading the U.S. Copyright laws and the "poor man's copyright" is not a valid way (in the U.S.)to prove your ownership of your art....this is according to the U.S. Copyright office. So...mailing a CD with your burned images on it is not the way to deal with this. I may have more comments, as I haven't even read the entire article yet, but I thought it important to clear up this misconception, soon. :-)

--
No need to thank me for every little thing.....I support sensible, reduced thanking. :D :heart:

Stop Art Theft
*killjoy:iconkilljoy: Jul 30, 2007, 7:36:48 PM
mm, the copyright office does not condone it as it garners them no fees, and it is entirely improper to use a poor man's copyright as a method of retaining rights over slogans, logos, or other such representative images, but clear understanding of the law states that the main rule is Possession of original work, what the poor man's copyright offers to the courts is proof of posession at a time in history via an outside source, certified mail, being something the united states government has and continues to use for legal matters, is the key here.

the copyright office hates it, but the courts will accept sealed, certified mail copies during a small claims case.

--
tony "killjoy" v.




theTraverse.org

- raising money for neglected causes







*killjoy:iconkilljoy: Jul 30, 2007, 7:41:45 PM
mm, to further this: The Netherlands and the United Kingdom also promote the use of this method, as do other countries.

While in a (United States) court case where one can face jail time ( i.e., not small claims) this is a rather flimsy defense, it does afford something else vital; the timestamps on the files within the CDR or DVDR are considered very good, especially if they are consistent , as in, preceding the postal timestamp, this is corraborative evidence, and the idea with these is to offer more proof then the Ripper, as that is the essential point of the fight in a small claims case over intellectual property.

--
tony "killjoy" v.




theTraverse.org

- raising money for neglected causes







`1arcticfox:icon1arcticfox: Jul 30, 2007, 8:19:15 PM
That's interesting, because I asked an attorney (U.S.) this specific question and he stated that the courts do NOT recognized a self-sealed/mailed copy of anything....as proof of ownership.

--
No need to thank me for every little thing.....I support sensible, reduced thanking. :D :heart:

Stop Art Theft
*killjoy:iconkilljoy: Jul 30, 2007, 8:52:48 PM
different proceedings, different gives. this is still something handy, especially for our non-US deviants where the laws can be very different.

where you'll find yourself up the legal creek without any sorta paddle is if your thief has run off and spent the $45 to register the art with the US Copyright Office. If you plan on making some serious cash off a piece and are spreading it around the digital world, you should, by all means, throw down the $45 at the copyright office for the registration. (or, go to your lawyerly 'friends' and spend more to have them do it for you.) the only thing that'll sting is your wallet, and thats if the art piece is a sales bust.

i personally hold my breath every time a lawyer opens their mouth, i've built enough of their websites and spent enough time around them to have taken up a rather strong disdain for their 'advice', especially on things one doesn't really need legal counsel over, like dealing with posers jacking art no one was profiting off to begin with. these are the same people that have often tried to tell artists that nothing is copyrighted til its registered with the copyright office, (outright lie, copyright is a technical given at time of creation.) and treat them as some sort of universal saviour to prevent theft and such. bogus claim, the US Copyright Office has deals with mostly western nations in regards to recognizing intellectual copyright registrations from the US, and even this is iffy, some western countries still don't practice the art that well and would sooner attempt hammering at the warheads of russian nukes before honor attempts at US Copyright cases on their citizens.

--
tony "killjoy" v.




theTraverse.org

- raising money for neglected causes







=starfantazy:iconstarfantazy: Jul 30, 2007, 10:08:34 PM
ive been ripped so many times its not funny

--
:heart: :star:
~Kovitlac:iconKovitlac: Jul 30, 2007, 11:51:53 PM
I don't think it'd be funny the first time;-)

I know what you mean, though. Not about getting art stolen, though - fortunately that has never happend to me.

--
"I was thrown out of college for cheating on the metaphysics exam; I looked into the soul of the boy next to me." - Woody Allen
=Aegis-Strife:iconAegis-Strife: Jul 31, 2007, 6:41:01 AM
Great summary here :thumbsup:

--
Aegis NET

The structure was weak.
The new one is stronger.
~glamourbandittt:iconglamourbandittt: Jul 31, 2007, 12:05:39 PM
Thank god this has never happened to me!

--
[link]
~7xxxx:icon7xxxx: Jul 31, 2007, 12:11:38 PM
Only idiots that cant do anything on thier own would do such things...