DA has its 7th birthday.
I had birthday too, and I got a present by another deviant.
This was the wonderful artwork "Under The Jaguar Moon",
it was made especially for me,
that`s why I am a member of the jaguarclan.
The artist didn`t want load it up at theirs own gallery,
I should do it in mine.
"Under The Jaguar Moon" was required by the DA-staff some days ago,
I was told in a note it were a "violation of copyright".
A very "nice" person "reported" the artwork to the DA-staff.
(In the deviations description everybody could read that it was a birthday-present from dear

to me. Or what do you think, how could the reporting fool know that this was not made by me? He could only know, cause I wrote it and gave credit to the artist.)
And in the same note I was told if I'd do it again my "account may be suspended for a period of time or banned".
I am the owner of this work, I cannot violate my own copyright, or what do you think about that?
When I came to DA, I loved this place.
Here I can share ideas with artists, here I can look for artworks for my fantasy- and game-world.
Here I find artist relations.
Yes, I love this place.
That had changed for a moment, cause I thought DA deleted my birthday-present.
OK, I can get the file back from the staff, they saved it.
Yes, I had no file at my computer, cause I thought DA were a safer place for artworks than my old PC.
Yes, the artist had it not longer at theirs PC, cause artists always need the space for new art.
But the kind comments in the comment section of the required deviation are away forever. The congratulations to my birthday are disappeared.
What would DA and the community say, if I could delete all the congratulations to DA's 7th birthday now?
OK, I cannot, and I want not.
Because I am here for enjoying art and not for destroying art.
DA is for art and enjoying art, right? Right.
If DA deletes the art of the copyright-owner (in this case the copyright-owner was me) from theirs own and paid account,
this is NOT enjoying for sure. Only the spammer is enjoying, for disappointing another deviant.
I am sure, the person who "reported" the required work never paid for a subscription. Not for theirs own, not for another sub.
I would like if I could love DA as well as before.
For that it would be useful, further not to believe to such anonymus persons who use the "report" like SPAM.
I know, other deviants have the same problem with "disappearing" works in theirs gallerys.
I have a wish to DA`s birthday: bann such spammers, not working deviants, please.
Because it can be EVERY artpiece reported by this or another anonymous fool tomorrow.
A good method for true "reporting" were to make it NOT anonymus.
The DA-staff should know who reports. If it is anonymous, every art-thief can start a revenge here at DA.
For the next 7 years to come
with fine art and not SPAM!
(Haha, I would say: rhymes, but it rhymes only in german pronunciation.)
Thank you very much!
Happy Birthday, deviantART!
Devious Comments
2. Thanks for in ways saying people who don't pay a subbie are all worthless spammers.
3. They gave you your art back, so don't worry about it.
--
"No one has greater love than this--a man laying down his life for his friends." John 15:13 WEY [link]
I'm Bulkhead in the deviantART Transformers Crew!
--
Paint deviantART green! - a skin for Firefox
>:]
I really understand your disappointing... I heard other deviants to have the same problem.
I thought that in those case you should be considered innocent unless a proof against you... not to have to prove you are the copyright owner for every report spammer here around.
What happened to Raine is really sad, I really hope in some improvement in the way these situations are managed.
--
A drop of colour saves me from the fate I'm facing everyday
~Hyde
the point was the "reporting" Myspace-people here.
Anonymous reporting reminds me to somewhat, but I say it not loud cause itis DA's birtday yet.
--
It's soooooooooo hard: [link]
Did you know? Chest bumping with suicide-bombers is dangerous!
White House Stolen By Art Thieves: [link]
And I was not the violator, the violator is the art-thief who reported.
They said the system is anonymus.
--
It's soooooooooo hard: [link]
Did you know? Chest bumping with suicide-bombers is dangerous!
White House Stolen By Art Thieves: [link]
To tell the staff a work is violated when you can see in the description why it is in my gallery and not in the gallery of
that is a kick into the artist relations.
--
It's soooooooooo hard: [link]
Did you know? Chest bumping with suicide-bombers is dangerous!
White House Stolen By Art Thieves: [link]
Yes, I didn't say you were the violator. I was just using generic terms:
- violator: someone who uses stolen material in the eyes of the reporter.
- reporter: someone who notifies staff about it.
- staff: should be clear.
.. that is, not saying, the violator actually did something wrong, someone (staff) still had to prove this.
But anyway, I would really like to know who told you this system was anonymous (to all parties involved), so I can verify this myself. Thanks.
--
Paint deviantART green! - a skin for Firefox
>:]
The person who reported that artwork must be not able to read simple descriptions.
Or how could he report that otherwise?
I have the suspect, it was someone who only wanted to disturb me. Who else would do such a shit?
--
It's soooooooooo hard: [link]
Did you know? Chest bumping with suicide-bombers is dangerous!
White House Stolen By Art Thieves: [link]
--
"No one has greater love than this--a man laying down his life for his friends." John 15:13 WEY [link]
I'm Bulkhead in the deviantART Transformers Crew!
--
It's soooooooooo hard: [link]
Did you know? Chest bumping with suicide-bombers is dangerous!
White House Stolen By Art Thieves: [link]
Previous Page12345 Next Page