Mmm... Actually i think it's a good measure.

In theory if you're below 18 it's against the law to see those things.

And no offense, i'm not sure of whether people below 18 are really able to appreciate the quality of artistic nudes and the such. With all the hormones you just look at other things and leave offending comments in those deviations.

I'm saying this because of i've seen it, especially in some DDs.

--
~ The two rules of procrastination: 1) Do it today. 2) Tomorrow will be today tomorrow ~

well obviously, google has been sued many a time, yet they still have the same sort of option for mature content. if google can do it, why not deviant art? not all of us are purely driven by hormones, and i personally have seen incredibly well done pictures that are labeled mature content just for the reason that , say, an angel has no shirt on, and im sure that michael angelo did not paint the roof of the sistene chapel just for pornographic purposes, did he?

--
People live their lives bound by what they accept as correct and true. That's how they define reality.
~TOIREAN 1985-Thursday, November 22, 2007
~cherigirl January 1980-2007

....don't talk such utter nonsense. DA is doing this to protect young members of the community and quite frankly under age members submitting nude style artwork should be frowned upon in the first place if thats what you are complaining about.
God help us all if having to make that one extra click to view a mature content deviation that is precisely not intended for under age viewers to see in the first place is all you have to worry over.

This also isn't news.. ranting and complaining about ridiculous things is what your journal is for... FAQ #687: What is news and what is not news?


--
USED MY STOCK? SEND ME LARGE VERSIONS FOR MY ARCHIVES PLZ!!!

FREE EXCLUSIVE STOCK HERE--> =Dreamers-of-Avalon CHECK IT OUT AND BECOME A MEMBER!!

Would you like some cheese to go with that whine Madam?

Hey, hey... no need to use lame examples here.

What I'm saying is, not everyone is as mature as you are. Some people coming from the US actually find such images offensive. Yes, a angel showing her breasts. A mother might think that her dear 13 year old daughter should not see those things.

Now, you wouldn't want devArt getting sued by that mom, would you?

In my opinion, however, the bar IS set too high. People that are 16 or 17 are mature enough, in my opinion. But not for the US law. And you can't change that.

--
~ The two rules of procrastination: 1) Do it today. 2) Tomorrow will be today tomorrow ~

I agree with you.

Those deviations don't need the click/visit of a 13 year-old.

--
~ The two rules of procrastination: 1) Do it today. 2) Tomorrow will be today tomorrow ~

im sorry, but i wasnt talking about submitting artwork, just veiwing it, and also i wish i could edit this, but i cant, as i found out that you cant view the deviations at all, and that has upset me. as for the not rly news thing, your right, i didnt think about that, but quite frankly, i dont have many watchers, and im not going to be a snotty little brat about it and argue over a stupid point, but i just want to get that piont out, and while your at it, why not read my other comment on what irenukia had to say.

--
People live their lives bound by what they accept as correct and true. That's how they define reality.
~TOIREAN 1985-Thursday, November 22, 2007
~cherigirl January 1980-2007

im prolly just gonna deal with it, but im upset, after teachers telling you that one person can change the world, i thought mabye i could try to change a community. o well. im not gonna freak, like i need a porn fix or something stupid. im just really dissapointed.

--
People live their lives bound by what they accept as correct and true. That's how they define reality.
~TOIREAN 1985-Thursday, November 22, 2007
~cherigirl January 1980-2007

Why should those of us that are under the age of eighteen but have enough maturity to view something have to be restricted just because of assumptions? People who aren't logged on couldn't just click on the button, and honestly, I highly doubt there were huge amounts of complaints. I think that the warning is enough, and if they know they're taking a risk, take a risk, and are affected, they were warned, and could've read the comment! It's not like porn! And that warning IS enough, because those who didn't take the warning seriously and still are affected negatively (what little there probably are.......) shouldn't have to ruin it for the rest of us!

--
"Say, are those real wooden legs?"
"Wooden legs, wooden arms......wooden eyes, too!"
-Rocko and Captain Crappy Jack, “Fish-N-Chumps,” Rocko’s Modern Life

But I don't really see why you'd get disappointed, it's not like you're missing out a LOT. Maybe a few deviations, but nothing you would miss out by not logging in one day

And wow. Teachers tell you that one person can change the world? Well, if you're a president of something important, maybe. But don't fool yourself ;]

--
~ The two rules of procrastination: 1) Do it today. 2) Tomorrow will be today tomorrow ~

i guess im kinda gullible. i do get dissapointed a lot tho. hey, im a teen, anything that represses our freedom instinctively makes us fight it, right?

--
People live their lives bound by what they accept as correct and true. That's how they define reality.
~TOIREAN 1985-Thursday, November 22, 2007
~cherigirl January 1980-2007