Sex and sexuality in art are some of my favorite things, and certainly sometimes arousal is part of this, but more importantly, it is FAR MORE than about simple arousal, as porn is. One of my deviantart friends,

, said that art of a sexual nature can provoke thoughts about our dreams, fears, desires, and place in the world"...yes! Well done art that deals with sex exposes the soul of the subject or act in question, not just the naughty bits. I feel that any kind of work on this site that looks at sexuality in a thoughtful or artistic or critical or celebratory, etc. way is certainly appropriate content for an art site, because, of course, this work is actually ART.
Devious Comments
--
Onlookers are asked to suspend disbelief for the sake of enjoyment.
But I'm not worried because employers wont look for how many pageviews you have but how much you know.
--
When photoshop wasnt a household name:
[link]
Are you fed up of people on devart who have millions of pageviews and just keep getting more because everyone loves them?
the read this article.
--
When photoshop wasnt a household name:
[link]
Are you fed up of people on devart who have millions of pageviews and just keep getting more because everyone loves them?
the read this article.
It's sad to think that there's people who aren't that talented that can just look up photoshop tutorials, and all of a sudden people think they're incredibly talented. I agree there's a huge difference between being a talented photographer and talented at photoshop. It seems people are forgetting the difference. I hope many people read your arguement and actually pay attention to it.
--
When photoshop wasnt a household name:
[link]
Are you fed up of people on devart who have millions of pageviews and just keep getting more because everyone loves them?
the read this article.
thanks
--
When photoshop wasnt a household name:
[link]
Are you fed up of people on devart who have millions of pageviews and just keep getting more because everyone loves them?
the read this article.
LightRoom is the only thing I use because it does only what you can do to film during its development.
Thankyou for putting this in the news section too
Means I can damn well spread it
--
Buying a Canon doesn't make you a photographer. It makes you a Canon owner.
When Photoshop wasn't a household name. [link]
and i think people need to see this, now if i was someone with 6 million pageviews, this would be the most popular thing ever.. but im not.. and thats what this article was all about.
see its catch 22!
--
When photoshop wasnt a household name:
[link]
Are you fed up of people on devart who have millions of pageviews and just keep getting more because everyone loves them?
the read this article.
I'm a user of Photoshop and I'll admit that, it's part of my style I've adapted. I can take a photo without photoshop, but I think photoshop enhances what is there. Heck, if photoshop had of been aorund years ago, think about how brilliant the photographers would be if they could photograph such brilliant photos WITHOUT it.
I am all for promoting new work and such and I cannot say much, because I submit things that get to the front page. However, I submit a range of photographs and i've learnt that you shoudln't submit for the masses, only for yourself.
--
Lara Jade.
larajadephotography@gmail.com
l a r a j a d e . c o . uk
Previous Page12345... Next Page