I have to admit that as a life drawing instructor I have a definite bias towards teaching students to draw from a live model as opposed to copying photos. Drawings done from life are full of interesting marks and line quality, they have a record of the struggle of the artist to find the pose, they show a connection with the subject and a soul that is devoid from art drawn simply by trying to faithfully reproduce a photograph.
I know many artists who try and teach themselves to draw, start by drawing from photos because they are a cheap model, they dont move and they are easy to find on the internet. But I try to discourage my students from relying on photos too much because in many cases they are lit in such a way as to negate the shadows on the figure or to have too dramatic of shadows. This makes it difficult to understand the anatomy and how to turn a form. What students learn from drawing from photos is how to render light and shadow, not how to draw the structural anatomy of the figure. Light and shadow change from model to model or from image to image. When you draw from the structural anatomy, this never changes... a clavical is a clavical... its a landmark that is easy to find on the model and helpful to line up with other structural points on the figure in order to get the correct gesture of the pose.
Drawing light and shadow also does not help students to understand the planes of the figure. A figure is like a cone or a cylinder. It has a top plane, a side plane and a bottom plane, and these help turn the form and make it look three dimensional. Learning to draw by establishing planes allows the student to start drawing in proportion and avoids the miscalculations that occur from tryng to draw from the head down.
Classical Drawing, an method of training the eye to see accurately!
The traditional academic way of teaching students to draw was to start them on Barque Studies. Charles Bargue's a Course in Drawing was a series of illustrated plates that students were taught to draw from using a method called sight size. The benefit of learning this way is that it was a 1 to 1 system of measuring, typically using a string to mark points along the form similar to the way sculptors would measure a figure prior to carving. This method allows students to develop their eye to 1/4 or even 1/8th accuracy and to provide a technique for determining where a drawing was off. (For anyone interested in the Bargue book it can be ordered through the Dahesh Museum)
Some Examples from DA artists of Bargue studies...



Next the student would progress to drawing from an actual cast where they would take the lessons learned from copying the Bargue drawings and apply them to a three dimensional object.
Finally after completing cast studies to the satisfaction of their instructor they would be allowed to draw from the model.
Drawing from the model was a priviledge for those who had trained their eye to a high degree of accuracy. Drawing from a live model, as any who have tried it can attest, is one of the most difficult and challenging aspects of being an artist. Taking a three dimensional, moving, shifting, living being and drawing them onto a two dimensional surface to create the illusion they are still three dimensional involves a complex ability to see and draw. Copying from Photos is easy, all the work has been done for you... the camera has already taken that three dimensional object and compressed into a two dimensional space. There is nothing for the artist to analyze, assess or evaluate. Other then perfecting the art of rendering value.. little can be learned from photo reference. It is drawing from life that provides the opportunity to grow and develop a skill in drawing and making assessments on proportion, length, value and structure. It is where students develop a sensitivity to line, value, halftones, reflect light, etc. It is where true art begins...
Some artists who draw from life and have reached a high degree of skill.





It is to this end that these artists work at their life drawings skills. Drawings done from life have a gesture, a beauty and a quality that reflects both the skill of the artist and the sacredness and soul of the model.
I hope you enjoy these examples of formal, academic drawing.
DD
Devious Comments
--
-Julia Grace-
If I favorite something I leave some specific positive feedback by way of comment. Please Check Out My Gallery and let me know if you like what you see. I appreciate all CC and feedback
There is a very real issue of becoming over-educated in drawing or painting the figure - or any object. The difficult transition is in learning from the past and present, and then putting that knowledge at a distance when creating your own work. Academic work is often full of virtuoso cliche's. Cliche is the ONE thing that a persons art should be free of!
A great deal of literal work is simply a series learned generalities combined together to make one large generality. I can almost see every little learned rule throughout the work. The bicep shape is generalized, the core shadow is generalized, the color shift is generalized and on and on.
Learn to draw from life and then search for your individual path. So many many artists stop their journey when the acquire the ability to draw accurately.
Lovely Darkdesyre, both you and I know that ANYONE can learn to draw from life. Drawing or painting accurately does not make someone an artist!
--
[link]
I think by far the worst set of generalities occur not with those who follow academic drawing... but those people who dont use live models. At least academic artists look at the figure to see whats going on rather then drawing from a general sense of the figure without any reference.
Learning to draw and paint accurately is one stage in a long progression of becoming an artist... but you have to start the journey somewhere. Wouldnt it at least be nice to start your journey as an artist on a solid foundation of drawing skills rather then a slippery slope of no technical skill
Academic figure studies all tend to look like Academic figure studies. Frequently, the individuality is bled out of them to the point that we can only say the work is well executed or poke at the weaknesses. They are practice, not product; and everyone knows it. If we really want to use the figure in art, we're fairly obligated to do something more than just draw what we see.
I think study of anatomy is especially beneficial, along with an approach to drawing that emphasizes internal structures and drawing forms from the inside out. The clavicle is a nice external landmark, but the ribcage, spine and pelvis provide a far better basis for describing the major masses of the figure, along with some notation for the head and limbs. Then, an understanding of musculature and the influence of fat deposits on surface anatomy allow one to make a more complete representation of the figure, regardless of local lighting conditions.
But to do all that with any success, you must be able to conceptualize the figure. Knowledge of anatomy is crucial to that conceptualization, and that conceptualization is what leads to better overall drawing. You have the relationships between forms in your head, and you can call them at will. Then, the living model or any grainy photo becomes a reference for making more interesting and personal works that may or may not concern themselves with accurate representation.
Does that make sense?
Of course you are always full of wisdom.
George
--
[link]
My goal is to actually represent various forms and disciplines of drawing and the associated benefits of them because I think that no one method encompasses all. I think as artists we should pick and choose are tools from various disciplines and find the ones that work for us. Unfortunately what I see here on DA, is far too many artists content with simple rendering from a photograph an exact duplicate. Im not sure if it is by choice or because no one has directed them to other possible areas of study and growth.
There are so many disciplines to look to for inspiration and technical skill. Academic drawing is but one.. but unfortunately I cant cover them all in one article... perhaps you can do it far better.
Previous Page12 Next Page