Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

 
[x]  
Shop deviantART for the holidays Click here! :holly:

Link




Share


  Share on twitter Share on Facebook Share on reddit Share on digg

Notices



More Photography News

She moves in her own way

=Darksolitude:iconDarksolitude: reports, 3h 16m ago
Expressive portraits:iconeufrosis:

Green

*Ariel87:iconAriel87: reports, 15h 25m ago
Close to me, no matter how much time we can spend apart we're still together
like we're one..

Paint !

=assica:iconassica: reports, 15h 6m ago
bright, joyful and colourful.. photo selection.. :)

Sunset Feature

~Drielix:iconDrielix: reports, 19h 6m ago
Pretty news thread featuring sunset theme

{watcher's feature} - part 2

=aimeelikestotakepics:iconaimeelikestotakepics: reports, 17h 12m ago
~75 beautiful photographs from my watch list!

A few words of advice for new models:

=photoswithattitude:iconphotoswithattitude: reports, 1d 22m ago
I get many questions asked by new models what is TFP? Why do I have to sign a release form, or what do you mean by "Implied Nude"?

So I thought the simplest way to explain it all is to write an article....

..{. November-Favourites .}..

~DeathxFairy:iconDeathxFairy: reports, 22h 16m ago
A collection of my favourites of November '09

ABC Photography Feature: Round #4!

`AshleyXBrooke87:iconAshleyXBrooke87: reports, 1d 6h ago
An ABC feature of photographs! A deviant for every letter of the alphabet :heart: Come check out the great thumbs :)

Photography Weekly - Issue 16

^Katerina423:iconKaterina423: reports, 1d 5h ago
A weekly magazine exploring the amazing photographs that have been submitted in the last week.

Snow... Ice... White... Winter 2009 Inspired!

*mayoofka:iconmayoofka: reports, 1d 17h ago
Everything inspired by WINTER created in November and December 2009!
ENJOY RIDING ON FIRST FRESH SNOW :D

Photography News This Week

ONE HUNDRED under ONE HUNDRED

*nerdynotdirty:iconnerdynotdirty: reports, December 4
This feature was brought together by my watchers and hours of browsing galleries for inspiring pieces that have gone unnoticed. Here are the results, one hundred beautiful photographs with under one hundred favorites. Let's give these artists the attention they deserve <3

Photography - Inspiration

*Laura1995:iconLaura1995: reports, December 3
enjoy this large collection of inspirational photography

100 pictures!

*leelloor:iconleelloor: reports, December 5
100 selected pieces!

Dreams & Nightmares photography contest

*fhrankee:iconfhrankee: reports, December 6
We have decided to organize this contest to motivate people create more art. We would be happy if you would give it a try. You can think of anything you want, just make sure you still respect the theme. You can choose to illustrate dreams, nightmares or even both of them. Anything you want! Try not to be macabre if you are picturing “nightmares”. Respect the rules, have fun and most important, follow your heart!

Art with a message part 6

*xXxLEARNTOFLYxXx:iconxXxLEARNTOFLYxXx: reports, December 4
All these artists deserve some feedback :heart:

“My life is my message.”

- Mahatma Ghandi

Close Your Eyes..

~Migrena:iconMigrena: reports, December 3
It's not all pitch-black in the back of your mind,
You might see something beautiful..

The BEST of the YARD's Street Photography!-Vol 11

#The-Yard-Collective:iconThe-Yard-Collective: reports, December 6
=The-Yard-Collective Street Photography Club,
presents its members' best submissions,
as they were chosen by members voting!

Monday features

*niwaj:iconniwaj: reports, December 7
Get featured! Just read it and join.

Best Of The Best ;; VERTICAL

~scream-for-silence:iconscream-for-silence: reports, December 5
This is the third part of my "Best Of The Best" features!
These features consist of my absolute favorite photography that i've collected since i've been a member of DeviantArt.

This feature's focus is on VERTICAL photography, give them some love! :+favlove:

Black and white collection - November

~Bouffe:iconBouffe: reports, December 6
Black and white collection from November.

Photography


"This is Not a Stock Image" Makes it Stock

^wynnesome:iconwynnesome: reports, March 30, 2008
Here's a note about a site feature that I know is affecting many photographers including myself, but one that I'm sure many people were not aware of.

The "description" in a deviation IS INCLUDED IN THE SITE SEARCH FEATURE. Not just the "keywords," which are supposed to be where you determine what search terms allow your deviation to be found in site searches. Every word you use in your artist description will cause your deviation to appear in a site search that includes that word.

This means that anyone who states, "This is not a stock image" automatically guarantees that the deviation will show up in every site search for "stock."

So by letting people know that our artworks are not available as a stock resource, we are actually telling people that our artworks are available as stock. Because I'm sure everyone knows as well as I do that not everyone is going to read the description and find the "NOT" before the word "stock" - just as the site search feature doesn't recognize the negative case either.

This was brought to my attention by a stock artist kind enough to let me know it was happening. I contacted the Help Desk, who told me that it had been "handed up the chain" to be taken care of. Weeks later, after a deluge of "Can I use your image in my photomanipulation?" notes, I wrote the Help Desk again. I'm now informed that deviation descriptions are meant to be searchable, so there is no intention of doing anything about this issue. The only solution offered is to alter the word "stock" in the description of EVERY deviation, so it has spaces (s t o c k) or some other such, and cannot be found by the site search. Despite the fact editing every deviation in one's gallery is a very time-consuming process, this is the only option given.

With all the issues of art theft around dA, it seems like a terrible idea to avoid addressing this problem. However if nothing else I hope to bring it to the attention of every artist on the site - BY TELLING PEOPLE THAT YOUR ART IS NOT STOCK, YOU ARE IN FACT PUTTING IT IN FRONT OF EVERY PERSON LOOKING FOR STOCK IMAGES TO USE.

Not to mention, this makes the site search feature much less effective all-around, again, because the site search does not recognize conditions or negatives. So if I were to say in my description, "Here is a departure from my usual subject matter of artistic nude images," THIS PHOTOGRAPH WOULD APPEAR IN A SEARCH FOR "NUDE" images. No wonder the site searches return so much material that is anything but what we were looking for.

So again - dA seems to have no interest in changing this functionality, but be aware - no matter what the context of any statement in your artist description, every word in it is searchable with the site search function.

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconuniquenudes:
It's happened to me, which is why my "not stock" disclaimer is on my front page, and not in the descriptions. Problem is, not everyone looks at your front page. *sigh* That is a tough problem.

--
Nakayama Photography Studios LLC
:groups: #NakayamaStudios
:iconcyclops22:
good one - food for thought, as i for one, never thought of the search results.

hope this makes the honchos think of a happy medium, as ignoring the issue only makes art thieves bolder.

--
it's more important to click with people than the camera. - Alfred Eisenstaedt :camera:
:icongroundlingchild:
Good article, but the title was a bit yellow-journalistic. It doesn't make it stock--it makes it show up when people look for stock. That's like saying "having a nude picture as your MM icon makes you an active nude model"--no, it just makes you look that way, and makes it frustrating when you then write "no nudes" in your bio.
:iconwynnesome:
I'm all for attention-grabbing titles.

And the point is that in many people's eyes - if shows up in a search for "stock," it IS stock to them. They don't look any further. That isn't right, but it is why, with all the art theft issues, this IS a problem to have the search feature working this way.
:iconwynnesome:
Exactly. Some people don't read anything anyway, but at least if it is in each deviation, it is there regardless of where they found that deviation.

I can only imagine now - for all the notes I'm getting saying, "I found your image in a search for stock, so can I manipulate it?" How many pieces are now being created using my images, that I don't even know about, with no permission, because people are searching "stock," finding my images, and just using them without saying a word.

Of course if I see such, I will ask for it to be removed, and turn it in as a copyright violation if it isn't. But problem is, having these images come up in a search is implying an invitation to use them for something that they are expressly not meant for - very confusing, and not a good use of the site's feaures at all.
:icongroundlingchild:
I think it sends a stronger message to say "No unauthorized reproduction" or "protected by copyright" than "this is not stock"--saying "this is not stock" seems to me like "this may look like stock, and smell like stock, but it's not stock. Sorry for the confusion" rather than "this is an original piece of art not intended for your use. Appreciate it in its complete form, as seen here, or buzz off"
:iconwynnesome:
I know what you're saying. Problem is... copyright is owned without even having to say a thing, but people don't listen to that either. Some people aren't going to read or listen to anything, but some people need that explicit, specific statement, to "get" it. Some people don't make the distinction of what "looks" like stock or not - they're not analyzing quality, they're just figuring if it exists, it must be available for use. So the higher the quality, the more desirable. Especially with probably a general ignorance of what true stock photography really is.
:icongroundlingchild:
"you steal this and I'll sue you" does not involve the word "stock"--my "best of" album has copyright information. Not because it makes it more legally protected, but because when you use professional legal language at people they take you more seriously. The fact is, most people on dA do NOT have a lawyer on retainer for suing copyright violators. Most people WON'T persue their copyrights. But if you're willing to, the best way to let people know that is by telling them in legal terms.
:iconwynnesome:
Yeah, I'm not sure. Considering I just sued someone a few weeks ago and won, I guess I'm good with the idea of suing if anyone messes with me and doesn't back down. I do think that the site should allow us to decide what wording to use in our comments, without it meaning that our images come up in searches they shouldn't. Keep keywords searchable, keep comments NOT searchable. It's like the example I stated: "Here is a photograph a little different from the nudes I usually shoot." Suddenly this image comes up in a search for "nudes." Which is not appropriate for my non-nude image, or to deviants searching for images that actually are nudes.
:icongroundlingchild:
yeah... my stuff comes up when you search uniquenudes because often my comments include stories of shooting together or traveling together... which can confuse people.
 

Site Map