Today's article may come as a bit of a surprise, given that the club posted one yesterday. Nevertheless, here's another one. Please let me advise that faving this news article will increase the chances of it being seen, and therefore increase the chances of the deviations within it being seen. I (~
mrjans) contributed all of these deviations, so I hope you enjoy.
Devious Comments
--
Noticias del dA en tu idioma en: noticias.deviantart.com
and FAQ #711: Can I remove or edit a news article I have submitted?
--
--
friction.fotografie | da prints | etsy prints
--
album now on sale info in journal
SITE [link]
*webgraphix
~DesignersJunior
*ProjectEarth
~artalliance
*DesignPot
=DA-Networking
~logotypes-club
~Club-Vector
~Happy-Flasher
~piano-society
--
album now on sale info in journal
SITE [link]
*webgraphix
~DesignersJunior
*ProjectEarth
~artalliance
*DesignPot
=DA-Networking
~logotypes-club
~Club-Vector
~Happy-Flasher
~piano-society
--
album now on sale info in journal
SITE [link]
*webgraphix
~DesignersJunior
*ProjectEarth
~artalliance
*DesignPot
=DA-Networking
~logotypes-club
~Club-Vector
~Happy-Flasher
~piano-society
--
friction.fotografie | da prints | etsy prints
and i've seen that link dozens of times. And i've read it. I've also read several articles and listened (in full) to the webcast interview by Mark Simon with Brad Holland.
The only short fall if it is that the artists doesn't give the grit of the bill, or rather the shady part of it. Such as the reasonable search, of which is in the bill, isn't defined clearly. There are several shady spots like this throughout the bill that need absolute clarification otherwise, if approved, then all artwork that wasn't properly registered (and only big name people could do that to the fullest extent) would be in jeopardy.
--
A better browser for Free
You don't truly understand something until you successfully teach it to someone else.
The more recent legislation, and the previous bill, pertain only to works that nobody can legally use because the original artist cannot by contacted in any way shape or form. It opens the art up for others to use. Should the original artist somehow appear, they can stop any and all use of said works. If the work were used for non-profit, they must simply cease use, the artist regains ownership and the work is no longer labeled as an Orphan Work. If the work is used for commercial gain and the artist appears, they must stop use of the work and the artist may be entitled to money.
That's how the bill works.
You do not have to register anything, so long as you're not a shut-in hermit that hides from society in the middle of the woods. And the argument that they can steal your work doesn't change the fact that anyone can steal your work right now. It doesn't change a thing in that regard.
--
... in my pantaloons.
I WANT DRAGON HOLIDAYS :U
Previous Page12 Next Page