Personally, I appreciate them both.
But to be quite honest, faves are more important
(to an artist or writer themselve)
Hm, why is that?Comments, yeah.
Everyone wants them.
ALL the time. No matter what. I've had a few times where I made nagging journals, constantly asking and begging people to comment my work no matter what. I didn't care if they had the time or not. I didn't care if they had a life or not.
I.
didn't.
care.
So, since I've seen (a few, actually a lot of) people get a bit overwhelmed only because some deviation that they worked on for hours on end doesn't get the needed amount of comments. But it has about over 30 or 40 faves. So what? I'd be honored to have one of my own deviations with that many faves. Wanna know why?
Because if half of you haven't realized by now, faves CAN get you noticed. Basically, it's like a dieses or a chain letter. It spreads.
One deviant faves it, others see it and they fave it as well. Possibly a few might even comment it. But that depends on who they are in general. I've had a few of my deviations faved by people I haven't even heard of, and still I get them all the time.
Unlike comments, they just give you more and more views. Nothing really special. Sure, you might get a few "oh that's awesome" or "that is so frappin' unique!" or whatever.
Well what if I wanted both comment AND faves, what do I do?What do you do?
Give in return.
If YOU want faves or comments, you're gonna' have to comment AND fave other deviations, and just like the subject before. You can get noticed. But it depends on the deviation. Though, of course, if you're one of those people who instantly want to get noticed. Then good luck. It's not gonna take you 15 or 20 deviations to reach up to about 5,000 or possibly 10,000 pageviews. But that is totally off topic. Maybe if I have time (or if i even want to) I'll probably do another news letter.
November 21, 2009 5:05 pm
~
elmagonia
Devious Comments
you have chosen some great realist artworks
You are right that it's very hard to shape the definition of hyperrealism and that it's under appreciated. Maybe because on the first sight it's very simple and it takes a while to get inside the meta level of this kind of art. Or maybe it's just a matter of taste.
btw. great art in there xD
--
here [link] for my
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
I´m really grateful you chose my painting, so I´m quite sorry complain, but you put it in the digital category, it is traditional though...
--
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain
--
Take a look to ~Dominicabra's gallery
--
* Original photorealistic artwork created in various techniques - oil on canvas paintings, pastel and pencil drawings - Art Gallery by Suzana Stojanovic
I guess that means they are so hyperrealistic that I couldn't tell the difference! lol...(or I couldn't read).
People do not seem to realise the great deal of effort and artistry required to produce any one of these pieces.
The production of an imaginary or non realistic piece, artistic and skilled as it may be, allows for a degree of flexibility and error that hyper/photo realism does not. In order to produce a realistic piece every aspect of the piece must be completely believeable or the illusion is lost. As people already have preconceptions of how they perceive the world this makes it even harder.
I do hope that articals like this help to enlighten the community regarding the level of talent among us and the sheer effort and skill that makes these peices what they are.
Thankyou
--
---------------------------~~~~~~~~~--------------------------------
Like the gunslinger said to the artist... "Draw!"
Previous Page12345... Next Page