In looking around dA, I find many examples of art and many examples of what may not be anything more than snapshots, doodles, etc. We all desire to showcase what we have created even if it is not of the quality that pleases others. Keep in mind that we all began somewhere; and for the good of the community and individuals in the community, I dont think that hurtful comments and/or blasting is the least bit beneficial as we were and many, including me, still are new to our craft. In an effort to grow the community, I would like to urge you all, and myself included, to help one another. Our quest, through art, is to explore and exhibit our own visions.
When people ask for critique, in my view at least, they are asking for what interests you as the viewer as far as the correct technical aspects, composition, design, color, etc. They are also asking what you think could be done to improve the piece. Nobody wants to be blasted with comments that imply that they are unworthy to create art. If I were to upload a photograph of a bug, for instance, and ask for critique, my hopes are that if I did something to make that image unappealing, by not holding the camera very steady for example; someone might comment that I might want to use a tripod or faster shutter speed to get a sharper image. I would most likely get my feelings hurt if someone were to say something like, Personally, I think this shot is all wrong. Its all blurry and you cant really make out what it is supposed to be. The lighting is off too. Id start over. While both responses let the artist (me) know that the bug shot isnt as good as it could be, the first response gives me somewhere to start in correcting the error. It gives me confidence by the fact alone that I wasnt bombarded with hurtful remarks. Being a community of artists, we are or should be here to showcase our own work, look at and possibly be inspired by others art, and to help our fellow deviants. I would like to add, though, that if you are the artist and a subject calls to you; rely on your own satisfaction of capturing it. Other people will not always view your creations as you do, and getting defensive will not change the other persons mind. Taking other peoples attitudes towards the effectiveness of your vision too close to heart will probably cause unhappiness and conflict between you and your future visions.
Now not far from that subject brings me to a question I had for myself and wanted to share with you all. When I began reading, Examples by Ansel Adams, I asked myself can you learn and/or be inspired by work that does not particularly interest you? My own conclusion, by the end of his book is a resounding YES! When I first looked through this book that is 24 years old, I wondered how it could teach me anything. By page 17, I was quickly jotting down notes, ten pages of notes to be exact. I was not impressed, at first, with Adams photography of the west. To be quite honest, I almost closed the book at page 5, to move on to another photographer. But in my determination to learn how to better improve my skills, I studied the images and read his enlightening descriptions. It helped me to decide what I liked and disliked about his images. One of the first steps in any creative process is relying on your knowledge and your desire to create.
I hope you take this opportunity to start looking at others art with a new perspective. Artists that ask for critique want critique not criticism. Remember when you were little and your parents or teachers told you that if you couldnt say something nice, dont say anything at all? I and many other deviants would probably agree that this would be a good rule of thumb. And dont forget, that inspiration can be found in unlikely places, even if only to confirm your views.
Devious Comments
--
A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you the less you know.
Diane Arbus (1923 - 1971)
My Website
--
Message Network Operator
Find help in #MNAdmin or #help
Chat in #devart and #Thumbsshare
I hear a lot of people griping about how you can "only praise" around here, and anyone who doesn't bow at an artist's feet at every deviation is frowned upon, and they use that as some sort of justification to spout hateful things.
I blame Simon Cowell. Not, him, personally -- just the way he acts on American Idol. He has 30 seconds to give a quick assessment, and I actually think he's sometimes clever in his remarks and I value his opinion. That doesn't make those sound bites valid critiques. He's in a unique position where he is responsible to move the show along. He doesn't have the time to be every contestant's friend and personal mentor.
Unfortunately, I think a lot of people see those kind of remarks as somehow helpful in the art world. They're not.
I wish three things: 1) that people realize that not everyone here is an expert (yet). 2) that there's more than simple disapproval involved in an unfavorable critique (you need to back it up). And 3) (and this one is important) that anything negative in a critique is done in the hopes of creating a positive outcome. That third point is more than the simple adage "if you can't say anything nice . . ." If you're going to risk hurting someone's feelings on a piece that may have taken them ages of blood, sweat, and tears, at the very least take that into consideration. If you can find only one nice thing to add, add it. At least give them something to work on in the future.
Or . . . just find another artist and move along! What a novel concept!
That being said, if an artist specifically asks for opinions, pull all the stops. That's a different story.
--
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep." --Scott Adams
--
~ sweet bitter words, unlike nothing i have heard, sing along mocking bird, you don't affect me ~
--
I belong to: *Ex-po-zure ~portrets *justportraits ~macrophoto ~Monocolour-photos =NaturPics-club ~railways *The-Railfan-Nation
Previous Page12345... Next Page