<img border="0" src="http://www.baltimoresun.com/media/photo/2008-07/41020928.jpg">
if you cant see image up top link---->
[link]link --->
[link]A satirical New Yorker cover cartoon picturing Barack Obama in the Oval Office dressed as a Muslim, his wife as a terrorist, and a portrait of Osama bin Laden hanging over a fireplace with a burning American flag elicited angry responses yesterday from the Democrat's presidential campaign and his supporters.
But The New Yorker defended the artist and its cover, which illustrates an article titled "The Politics of Fear," as a satirical look at the scare tactics and misinformation being used to derail Obama's campaign. The magazine noted that two serious articles on the candidate's political education and rise in Chicago accompany the piece.
"The burning flag, the nationalist-radical and Islamic outfits, the fist-bump, the portrait on the wall? All of them echo one attack or another. Satire is part of what we do, and it is meant to bring things out into the open, to hold up a mirror to prejudice, the hateful, and the absurd. And that's the spirit of this cover," a New Yorker spokesman said in a written statement.
Obama's patriotism has been questioned during the campaign, such as after his initial refusal to wear a flag lapel pin - a decision he reversed - and when his wife, Michelle, told a rally audience in February that she was proud of America for the first time in her adult life.
--------------------------------------------------
Barack Obama link--->
[link]
Devious Comments
--
and hey I'm sure it could be pretty well natured sattire. just, nobody's gonna believe that if you put it on ur cover and say "here, this is what we're talking about this month."
dumbasses
--
~<3 Erik
--
"You were once shoved headfirst through someone's vagina. Why are you acting so dignified?"
xkcd #291
But as the bitch that I am, I frigging love it.
Haha.
--
follow the white rabbit...
-------------------------------------
It was the little sneaky portait of Bin Laden on the side that got me: Look world, we're going to have "The Enemy" in the oval Office. Not too subtle, but it shows the world where The New Yorker is really coming from.
Get used to it. Your a target to sell magazines, as always
--
If you are crazy enough to date me then your too crazy for me to date
That been said, I don't care for the illustration, regardless what it was intended to mean. A lot of people have compared Bush to Hitler, I've yet too see any major right-wing publications satirizing that phenomenon. Why? Because people (particularly republicans) would take it the wrong way. DUH! I guess common sense was in short supply at The New Yorker this month.
The New Yorker is known for it's illustrated covers and usually they're pretty well done. This month's cover, however, isn't drawn all that well and the composition is lacking. On top of missing it's mark as a satire, this cover will probably be posted as "how not to compose a magazine cover" in graphic art classes.
In the end, it's just a magazine cover. Anyone who makes too much this event (boycotts, burnings, condemnation, etc.) needs to reassess their priorities.
--
Cloxboy's website: [link]
Inside the magazine along with the story would be one thing.. Front Cover without preamble.. was really ill thought out on their part, but also the issuing drama, IMO, is a bit over done.
I mean.. When Rev. Jesse Jackson wants to 'cut your nuts off' you might have bigger fish to fry then closed minded idiot mongers who believe whatever they see/hear without further investigation or, heavens forbid.., actual proof.
--
You can not learn anything if you feel you already know everything..
help fight breast cancer [link]
The problem is most people will walk by, see the cover and have instant confirmation of their inner prejudice and ridiculous world view.
--
If a kid asks where rain comes from, I think a cute thing to tell him is "God is crying." And if he asks why God is crying, another cute thing to tell him is "Probably because of something you did.
Previous Page12 Next Page