Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 
[x]  

Link




Share


  Share on twitter Share on Facebook Share on reddit Share on digg

Notices



More Photography News

Animals Kingdom

*Funtoon:iconFuntoon: reports, 21h 53m ago
An awesome shot for ( Animals Kingdom )Hope you like it .. :D

30 Fantastic Photography Features - Part 6

*RaineJoybringer:iconRaineJoybringer: reports, 7h 9m ago
Another 30 fantastic photographers you gotta check out!

Girls

~IpekEyes:iconIpekEyes: reports, 1d 23h ago
.

Winners of our "Make Me Laugh" Contest!

=PhotographersClub:iconPhotographersClub: reports, 1d 1h ago
The news article version of our contest winners feature! :)

The Photography-APN Live Critique Project!

^kkart:iconkkart: reports, 20h 19m ago
Introducing the Photography-Animals, Plants & Nature Gallery Live Critique Project!

Please click the news article title for more information.

This evening at 10pm Eastern time US, the Photography-Animals, Plants, & Nature gallery here on deviantART brings you "The Live Critique Project" taking place in Photography-APN deviantART Chatroom.

All are welcomed and one doesn't have to be a premium member to participate. All details are contained within the link so please read as how this will work.

So be sure to swing by and join in on the fun! Everyone is welcomed!

RAIN

~secdelent:iconsecdelent: reports, 1d 1h ago
The beauty of the rain

The Best of Freestyle Vol. VIII

=PhotographersClub:iconPhotographersClub: reports, 1d 1h ago
A feature of the best 50 submissions we received in our October 2009 freestyle week.

Double one photograph

*ManGo-01:iconManGo-01: reports, 1d 18h ago
^^

1) Numbers in photography - one

*davespertine:icondavespertine: reports, 1d 16h ago
numbers in photography - one (1)

Photography News This Week

Nothing to Hope

*scheinbar:iconscheinbar: reports, 2d 15h ago
There's nothing to hope?
If you see all these wonderful pics from my novembre-features
you will learn: there is a lot of hope

Finest Macro, Nature and Invertebrates in Squares

=rav777:iconrav777: reports, November 27
Finest Macro, Nature and Invertebrates in Squares

I LOVE MY PETS! - 08

`emmil:iconemmil: reports, November 27
Various faces in one name: LOVE! :D

If you like it, another feature in this series will keep coming!! :heart:

- `emmil

Pretty in Pink (VI)

=rav777:iconrav777: reports, 2d 23h ago
This is the 6th edition of ' Pretty in Pink ' - A huge collection of carefully choosen deviations from the photography/people & portraits-galleries.

Best Of The Best ;; SQUARES

~scream-for-silence:iconscream-for-silence: reports, November 25
This is the first of a series of features I will be doing.
They consist of my absolute favorite photography that i've collected since i've been a member of DeviantArt.
This feature's focus is on SQUARES, give them some love :love:

Coloured and Colourless VI

*recepgulec:iconrecepgulec: reports, November 23
We love square :)

The sunny side

~6igella:icon6igella: reports, 2d 2h ago
Sit back and see some pictures about the happiest things of the world. About the sunny side.

Better Digital Photography Magazine-Free online

^kkart:iconkkart: reports, November 26
From the Publishers of "What Digital Camera" and "Amateur Photographer", IPC Media today has announced a new online photography magazine, "Better Digital Photography" that people can read free and fully online, it is also interactive with embedding video tutorials from the magazine and mouse-over tips. Aimed at the entry and intermediate level photographer, it is heavily devoted to equipment and technique-focused photography content.

From the IPC Media website:

Publishing director Alex Robb says: “This is an exciting and innovative new venture for the photo portfolio. The editorial team have worked incredibly hard to create bespoke content, including technique videos and other interactive content. I am delighted that we have secured distribution to around two million photographers to ensure that as many people as possible benefit from the excellent tips and advice. Better Digital Photography is a further indication of how IPC continues to innovate in this competitive sector.”

Editor Mat Gallagher adds: “We wanted to create a product that helps the reader expand their knowledge, while being easy to use. It is thanks to the talents of art editor Steve Crabb that we have managed to produce such a visually stimulating and accessible magazine that surpasses anything else in the market place.”


My thoughts, this is downright awesome and VERY well done, it is like looking at an actual magazine, but the fact that it has videos embedded within for tips, tutorials, and techniques, make this even better! You can also subscribe for free, via email for upcoming issues, make personal notes within the magazine, and download a copy to your hard drive. GO GET IT!

Late Monday features

*niwaj:iconniwaj: reports, November 24
Features

Photography


FEATURE: Popular vs. Unnoticed

*dareme:icondareme: reports, September 24, 2008
Some work on dA is faved by thousands+ people; other is only noticed by a dozen or so. But how much is that really an indicator of the quality of the work?

So you guys - here's a little game. There are NO prizes; because this is about fun and about showing that favs, in fact, do not make a piece of art good or bad; they just flag it as "popular". :)


Here's how:
These features come in pairs of two. ONE of the two is popular; the other isn't (so much).
So, how to decided what is popular and what isn't? I'm going by favs. I'm measuring it like this: The popular deviation has roughly 10-times more favs than the "unnoticed" one.
So; if the unnoticed one has 5 favs, the popular one has to have at least 50.
If the unnoticed one has 300 favs, the popular one has to have roughly 3000.

So "unnoticed" and "popular" are comparative terms here and only apply within the pair.

Try telling which one of the two is the popular respectively unnoticed one. Can you see a difference in quality? Is it obvious which one is popular and which one isn't? Or is there something like chance playing with what deviations go on to become popular and which don't?

You decide.

For your own fun: Try guessing first, and read the answer only afterwards! Believe me, that's the way you wanna be doing it. Answers are in that line of text right underneath the thumbs.

Ready? Set. Go!


vs.
The unnoticed [on the right] has 30 favs. The other [left] over five hundred.


vs.
[left:] 15 favs. [right:] 160+ favs.


vs
[left:] 321 favs. [right:] The unnoticed has 33.


vs.
[left:] unnoticed with 55 favs. [right:] has 424 favs.


vs.
[left:] 1200+ favs. [left:] 75 favs.


vs.
[left:] Unnoticed at 9 favs. [right:] 486 favs. (This broke my rule of 10x more favs, because it's actually ~50x more favs. But I thought they looked so cute together!)


vs.
[left:] 3500+ favs. [right:] 300 favs.


vs.
[left:] has over 1700 favs, [right:] ~130.


vs.
[left:] 85 favs and [right:] 850.


vs.
[left:] 45 favs, [right:] 340.


vs.
[left:] 23 favs, [right:] 217 favs.


vs.
[left:] unnoticed with 78 favs, [right:] popular with 1300+


vs.
[left:] 332 favs, [right:] 34 favs.


vs.
[left:] 7 favs, [right:] 132 favs.


vs.
[left:] only 2 favs. [right:] (only?) 43 favs.


vs.
[left:] 91 favs, [right:] 7 favs.


vs.
[left] 69 favs vs. [right:] 900 favs.


Hope you had fun playing (I did!), and I'd love to hear how often you could tell "popular" from "unnoticed". =D
Don't hold onto your favs: Make an artist happy by giving them out!

Thanks for playing. :dance:



Disclaimer:
For the sake of this game some photographs were listed as "popular", others as "unnoticed".

Q: Do I mean to say that the unnoticed get too little attention?
A: In my opinion, yes. But you decide! Don't feel obliged to fav it because I say they're underappreciated.
You're the boss; you choose!

Q: So, vice versa, are you saying the popular deviations get too much attention?
A: Certainly not. If I thought that why feature them and thereby expand their popularity further? I love all artwork in this feature; I wouldn't have featured it otherwise.

This is mostly for fun; my point is this: Favs do not determine the quality of the work, but the popularity, and both can (but don't have to) be proportional.

Devious Comments

love 3 3 joy 1 1 wow 1 1 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconsmichas:
I got it wrong 9 times! x_x
:iconsmichas:
Oh, btw: great idea!
:iconsimoendli:
Great idea, great article. :w00t:
BUT: Ich weiss au nöd, irgendwie .. ich hettis glaubs lässiger gfunde, chönd mer die Favourites-Zahl verstecke, oder das mer die ersch an Schluss anetah hetti, so as di gross Uflösig. Aber dän wärs au wider blöd gsi mitem ue- und abescrolle ..

Isch eich na truurig, dass Fotis, wo qualitativ hochstehend sind, wo d Idee passt, wo ö;ppis überebracht wird eifach undergönd .. da frögi mi eifach how many people just stay at the "popular front page" and see which deviations has a lot of favourites, but no one is browsing through the galleries.

Jedefalls en kuule Artikel und ich han es paar Perle drunder gfunde :love:

Ich hoffe es git wiiteri Artikel i dere Art .. und .. ich hasse dini Änglischkänntnis :blowkiss:
:iconvasqi:
excellent article. ;)
you get a gold star!

--
Life is a spectacle. If you're not looking, you're missing it.
-Sean Morris
:iconamarand:
Nice article, I can tell you why the pieces you chose are either popular or unnoticed:

I hate to generalize, and would rather go through each individual piece, but what it comes down to for me (and probably others as well) is that a Favorite is something you place on your site...it represents who YOU are, what YOU like. I may see a pretty picture and think "ooh, that's neat, but I wouldn't want it representing me as a favorite piece of art."

Take, for instance, the first piece comparison: the right-hand side looks like it could be an advertisement for a band, or Coca Cola, or whatever. We're so inundated with advertisements on a daily basis (thousands daily) that we just tune them out. Polished, well-thought out, photography that appears designed with only a generic emotion involved ("Rock concert, Coke is it, Refreshment!") versus something calm, serene. So many people (especially on a place called deviantART) do not want to be associated with, and spread as a meme, something which appears intended to do just that.

Second comparison: it's the whole suicide girls, stereotypical grimacing shot. It looks well-thought out and planned. The emotion looks unreal. When I saw that, I thought "wow, extreme close-up, cool..." but then I went on to think "...just like the 100,000 others I saw this past year." People trying to emulate currently popular art without any personal purpose other than trying to be popular. Is there a message? Not one that I can see. HOWEVER, the piece on the right that has all of the favorites...it's someone, and a piece, who is obviously trying to send a message. The piece is useful in my favorites if I want to convey that message. Also, it's not well composed (static composition, subject dead-center) so it looks less polished, and therefore seems less of a marketing/advertisement, which of course appeals to an audience of folks who might visit a place called deviantART. :)

I'm glad you switched it up on the third one...the left is cool, minimalistic, has a message and a lot of people would enjoy having that pop up on their favorites. The right one? Looks like clip-art I'd buy to put on the front cover of a corporate annual report. We're so desensitized by marketing messages that any symbology that is used repeatedly just disappears, until another style is co-opted, it becomes popular, is overused, and then a new style must be sought. The right piece seems fresh to me. Someone's experimenting, and has a message.

Fourth: guy with a bike in black and white versus quirky girl with a quirky expression with quirky color. The message works, and people here want to be associated with quirky...not "I'm going to go mountain bike with my Trekkk Bike drinking my Gatorade and Super Chibi Energy Bar."

Fifth: the girl on the right...I'm not sure an advertising agency could use her because she has a lot of emotion, and that's not easily co-opted. It would require sanitization...and that would remove the actual emotion from the piece. Ad agencies homogenize pieces to make them relate to the highest number of demographic groups (or at least not offend anyone) unless they are specifically targeting a demographic. This piece is a fun art piece...not yet co-opted...it does not appear to have become a symbol in a language of commerce...yet. So it's fun, and people like it. Who doesn't like crying robot chicks? ;) The right? It's just a gratuitous sprig of nature. Again...very usable in commercial art.

So I go down the list, and I see these pieces...one thing I notice is that the people who are popular are posting a lot of pieces that are pretty visceral and emotional in nature (in the present and past). They've drawn in an audience over time, with a larger number of submissions, and the people like what they see. I don't think you can discount the commercial versus non-commercial impact...because quirky people like quirky art - and don't enjoy (whether consciously or unconsciously) spreading commercial memes.

Whew...great article though! :heart:
:iconpatstome:
hat dich da etwa unser kleiner diskurs drauf gebracht???
ich finde die idee und den artikel sehr, sehr gut! : )

--
"One cannot eat as much as one would like to vomit."
:iconfelixklee:
Nicely done. and I`m really glad to be in there.
Wonderful. :hug: :)
:iconwandasy:
thanks :) great article :)

--
Én voltam!Én vagyok!Én leszek!Még akkor is,mikor hamuvá esek szét.Mert örök a lét, s itt hagyom lenyomatom, mi nem más,
mint sok - sok aprócska atom.
:iconconlievimani:
Interesting work! thanks for insert my shot in your article..
I agree to amarand's point..(QUOTE: "a Favorite is something you place on your site...it represents who YOU are, what YOU like. I may see a pretty picture and think "ooh, that's neat, but I wouldn't want it representing me as a favorite piece of art.").
besides, there is also the luck-factor.. many shots are unnoticed just because a few people run into them..
However, recently I was looking through Cartier-Bresson's scrapbook... and I was noticing that some of his shots were much "imperfect" for tecnic-qualities but so extraordinary.. so intense..
I think photography is a very subjective art... quality is not always important.. many times what is more important is the impact one shot has on our minds..
:aww:
:iconliar01:
i dont like this game. thats a shit
at least compare similar stuff u idiot...

--
everybody lies
 

Site Map