Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 
[x]  

Link




Share


  Share on twitter Share on Facebook Share on reddit Share on digg

Notices



More Policy News

CEA Update; Invalid "Art Theft Reports"- Why?

$realitysquared:iconrealitysquared: reports, August 25
Some members of the community have expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that not every "Art Theft" report is acted upon by staff; this article is intended to address the misinformation and inflammatory statements circulating about why this happens.

CEA UPDATE: Clarifying the Definition of Porn

$realitysquared:iconrealitysquared: reports, July 29
The official definition of “ pornography ” has been modified at several points over the lifetime of deviantART in an attempt to bring greater clarity in the wording used however portions of the community have demonstrated a tendency to be confused on the exact definition and continue to report things which fit their own personal viewpoints; today we attempt to clarify things.

Break it down easy - Tracing Edition

$chix0r:iconchix0r: reports, February 5
An easy break down of the guidelines & policy pertaining to tracing.

CEA UPDATE 20090130; Issues Involving Copying

$realitysquared:iconrealitysquared: reports, January 30
Copying, referencing, painting over, redrawing, tracing; there are many ways that a work can be duplicated and there are portions of the community which revile all of them. Today we clarify exactly where official deviantART policy stands on the matter.

CEA Update 20090120: Moderation System Changes

$realitysquared:iconrealitysquared: reports, January 20
In this CEA update we’d like to announce some changes in the moderation system which the community uses to bring theft and unauthorized use of works to the attention of the staff.

Effective awareness raising on dA

$chix0r:iconchix0r: reports, January 13
A guide of how to raise awareness in the most effective way, without breaking policy on deviantART.

CEA Update 20081119: Lewd and Sexual Commentary

$realitysquared:iconrealitysquared: reports, November 19, 2008
This week we discuss the issue of lewd and disrespectful commentary.
187 comments   Policy News  Last +fav: ~ANV60

CEA Update 20080511: Clarifying Mature Content : I

$realitysquared:iconrealitysquared: reports, November 5, 2008
In this update we continue with our series clarifying Mature Content, focusing this time on what Ideologically Sensitive content actually and when it needs to be tagged as Mature Content.

CEA UPDATE 20082409: Clarifying Mature Content

$realitysquared:iconrealitysquared: reports, September 24, 2008
Over the years we have been functioning with a set of Mature Content guidelines for nudity and erotica in our FAQ which have been extremely general and open to a great amount of interpretation, we hope to clear this up today.

CEA Update 20080910 Proper Harassment Reporting

$realitysquared:iconrealitysquared: reports, September 10, 2008
This week I would like to discuss proper reporting of harassment issues

Who loved it?

=PhotoImpactPixels
~Snowlyn
~WaTeRbOy14
~Amborama
~DeAngelus
~The-Synner
~precipiceflower
*Gaphas
=Zeddish
~guad
~watchmanspain
~BlueSpeedsFan92
~Martrochs
=iimaaART
~Sihira-Hedgehog
~lyzeravern
`IBinsanity
~VietSnake3
*SkiitzPixel
~domitar
~Fanficloverforever33
~sora-h
~greenkitsune
~Moonlit-Torch
~DarthMar
~boya-monkae
=ObSeSsiVe-PyRoMaNiA
~never-been-kissed
*keirushii20
~Manah-Angel-Eyes
*LUNA-MOON824
~Feyrai
*Clopina
=fusuichikaku
~Oh-EmGee
=Tijgerkat
~HazuraSinner
~Fangette
=arumise
~yapsharmaine
*peastew
=eevachu
*ChibiLucius
~fuzzitoh
~Illiark
~hana-dawn
*catnipz
~Koinu-Yukina
~SimplyMeez
~Sennel
~Jaded-Emeralde
~rairen
~TenshiHime-Chan
*shinkamalei
~Kurishu
~inugirliscrazy
~Poofee
~Scorpin-Girl
*angelishi
~DrakaDark
~Hellsing365
~BlackHawkOmega
~Kawazu-chan
~serenitymyst
~xandria-tchebbi
~InvincibleOne
~haffifit
~EddieGillspie
~NeonSadist
~Planiesfera3
^ElectrikPinkPirate
*lolzotp
=eskimoblueboy
=Kamo7s
=allie2590
~Obscurity-cross
=DominoNoel
~Shinigamixx
~DalekAvion
~Lettersinaghosttown
=bluemoon214
~alchemistkira6
~ReenaCat
~grygon
~WyndFyre
`manicho
*Asinayth
=Sasori1234
~DarknessofEverlife
~Fala-Amaris
~Aktjira
~ayakaro
`2dazed
*Lil-Desa
~Gie
~forte-girl7
~MandraKara
*OneWhoCreatesT
=Tsu-la
~AnnieAngelofFire
=transylvaniandreams
*Shinanai
~bewarecalamity
~experiment-fatso
~SeyaThePhan
=Alis86
~Rhay-Robotnik
=ancode
~Johncleric
*sakky-attack
~moonlight-fox
~Tigerfog
=SophiaRenu
~laceratedwrists
*kurumi158
~Cimoetz
=memnon0288
~Meestlic
~amyjenc1
~Yami-Kuro

x 2702 devious rejections

Policy


CEA UPDATE 20090130; Issues Involving Copying

$realitysquared:iconrealitysquared: reports, January 30
Tracing, Copying and Other Issues Involving Duplication of Existing Works

The Copyright & Etiquette Administration here at deviantART is often presented with challenges, one of the most basic and important of which involves helping artists enforce their rights over their own original work. While this may seem to be a very clear and easy to understand directive it is complicated almost daily by the simple fact that artists copy one another.

It is inescapable that when you gather millions of artists together into a central location which is filled to the brim with their individual ideas and creativity several things are going to happen; separate artists will submit similar things without ever having heard of the other, artists will inspire other artists who will then make similar looking works, and some artists will blatantly copy other artists.

The last situation is one which causes many in the community some concern.

Deliberate copying can take many forms; direct tracing, painting over, “referencing”, redrawing, using similar scenes in photography, making a similar skin, using the same stock resources to produce a similar work.

Regardless of how it’s done copying is looked down upon by many here on deviantART as unoriginal, a cheap shortcut, as “cheating”, as a form of theft, and when it involves a fandom it tends to be viewed as a cheap and guaranteed way to get popular with little actual effort.

While all of this is true to a certain extent it is also true that the various forms of copying are a completely valid learning tool which is practiced primarily by beginning artists and, quite frankly, those artists who lack the experience and training to compose completely original scenes and themes from scratch.

It is the task of CEA to balance these two concerns without condemning or defending one side or the other.

We understand that some segments of the community will always condemn the behavior while others who practice it will refuse to give it up and while the middle ground which we seek to hold will most likely not make everyone happy we believe that it is the best position available which will allow us to assist artists in enforcing their creative rights while not having to turn away those who are not able to meet some arbitrary test of originality.

To this end current deviantART policy attempts to strike a balance between tolerating a certain level of duplication while making certain that the rights of original artists are supported.

The current policy is as follows;

Reproduction of Existing Works by Any Method
Situations listed under the heading of Not Tolerated will override the situations listed under Usually Tolerated

  • Not Tolerated

  • • Reproduction is misrepresented as being something other than a copy of an existing work.
    • The reproduction exactly duplicates an original work and the owner of the original work files a complaint.
    • The reproduction targets a stock resource and violates one or more of the Terms and Conditions for use.
    • The reproduction actually contains elements of the original (i.e. photo showing through paintover).


  • Usually Tolerated

  • • The reproduction has been posted into a Fan Art Gallery.
    • The reproduction has been posted into the Scrapbook area.
    • The reproduction targets an element of pop culture (i.e. Anime screenshots or official video game content).
    • The reproduction properly credits the original.


  • Normally Tolerated

  • • The reproduction obviously copies an existing work but possesses noticeable and substantial differences.
    • The reproduction obviously copies an existing work but is noticeably deficient in quality.
    • The reproduction and the original bare only vague or broad resemblances to each other (i.e. poses, etc).


    It is important to note that the only two areas where copied works are deemed acceptable are the Scrapbook and the various Fan Art galleries. The deviantART staff reserves the right to relocate any copied works which are found residing elsewhere without prior notice.

    Devious Comments

    :iconchix0r:
    :#1:

    --

    Director of Community Operations
    deviantART, Inc.
    ---
    Sunlight coming through the haze.
    :iconeternalfallacy:
    :nod:

    --

    [link]

    Pisanie poprawną polszczyzną daje ci +5 do lansu.
    :iconfighting0the0music:
    -thumbs up-

    --
    "Life without friends is a soda with absolutely no bubbles."

    Good thing I like my soda flat. :roll:
    :iconsilken:
    Well, that clears things up.

    You're quite right that there are going to be poeple who will be pissed, but you can't please them all.

    Unfortunately, there's no way to prove that the original screen shot is still there and 'showing through' with an exactly traced vector screen shot.

    There are also a lot of poeple who will be gloating on this one...*grin*

    --
    etsy shop
    blog
    flickr
    twitter
    :icontalescaper:
    "# Usually Tolerated
    • The reproduction targets an element of pop culture (i.e. Anime screenshots or official video game content)."

    Is there a reason why this is usually tolerated, seeing as it obviously falls under the category of "when it involves a fandom it tends to be viewed as a cheap and guaranteed way to get popular with little actual effort."?

    And seeing as the toleration of uploading screenshots to dA can significantly change its function from an art-site to a photobucket/imageshack like bin of random stolen images?

    --
    Supporting and informing deviants near you
    --
    Sine Somnis, Sumus Nemo.
    :icongothic-pyro:
    That does clear a lot of things up.

    Although, what exactly is meant by "The reproduction targets an element of pop culture (i.e. Anime screenshots or official video game content)"
    That's the only line I find to be a little vague.(or it's just me, which would make sense too.)
    And why it's usually tolerated?

    Although I wish the vector issue, which many are angry about, would have been completely addressed.
    Mostly concerning certain indiviuals who do nothing but completely vector over the original screenshots, so it's basically exact copies.


    But over-all I think this will be very helpful.

    --
    "Your face reminds me of something so safe, so harmless. If I was someone paranoid, I'd think you were a serial murderer, but the one who gains your confidence to harvest testicles."-~PaxtonMan
    :iconghost-dreamer:
    Granted, my initial reaction was to grind my teeth when I saw the fan art allowance but given that "not tolerated" can override "tolerated" and thus gives the artist the right to have it removed I think you've come once again as close as possible to formulating a policy that allows you to govern the site as fair as possible.

    There is still a grey area with "an exact duplicate" but that grey area would exist just the same if you had simple stated "duplicate"; the final decision will thus sit with the policy team.

    It is clear that a great deal of time and effort is put into reviewing and formulating the policies used to govern the site, and I can imagine that it isn't the most thankful job either :D

    Well done to the whole policy team and my sincere thanks for keeping it fair and balanced for all.

    --

    That's right children - Pillage, THEN Burn!
    :iconthetifftiff:
    While all of this is true to a certain extent it is also true that the various forms of copying are a completely valid learning tool which is practiced primarily by beginning artists and, quite frankly, those artists who lack the experience and training to compose completely original scenes and themes from scratch.

    Technically this kind of person doesn't exist. Everyone can compose an original scene from scratch. They may not be able to do a good job of it, it may not look near as good as they want it to, but they can do it. I'm also confused as to how tracing with a mouse (vector work or those things that try to pass themselves off as dolls) would help one learn to draw.

    The reproduction exactly duplicates an original work and the owner of the original work files a complaint.

    Does this mean we should track down the original artist rather than report it? Also what if they don't have a deviantart account and you don't know how to contact them?

    It is important to note that the only two areas where copied works are deemed acceptable are the Scrapbook and the various Fan Art galleries.

    I honestly have no problem with traces in scraps and while I'm still saddened by their allowance in the fan art galleries I also know there's nothing I can do. What about traced doll bases though? Every one that I've reported has come back invalid even though they weren't in either of those categories.

    --
    Being a gay man involves too much penis.
    --
    SCIENCE WILL HELP LESBIANISM - =OuroborosCobra
    :iconcatwoman4ever:
    :clap: Thank you so much for the clarification!

    Although I am still a little bothered by the fact that making something a "fan art" seems to escape the "not tolerated" rule to a degree. But I do find it fair to balance it out with allowing "not tolerated" to override "usually tolerated".

    --
    Have an issue with a Daily Deviation?

    DEVIANCE-ZINE .

    Faith in Humanity: :| :| :|
    :iconmaryseif:
    *amused*

    I'ma just sit back and watch the drama unfold now. *grabs popcorn*

    --
    ....and then there was soup.

    [link] <-- Go. Now.
     

    Site Map