Tracing, Copying and Other Issues Involving Duplication of Existing Works
The Copyright & Etiquette Administration here at deviantART is often presented with challenges, one of the most basic and important of which involves helping artists enforce their rights over their own original work. While this may seem to be a very clear and easy to understand directive it is complicated almost daily by the simple fact that artists copy one another.
It is inescapable that when you gather millions of artists together into a central location which is filled to the brim with their individual ideas and creativity several things are going to happen; separate artists will submit similar things without ever having heard of the other, artists will inspire other artists who will then make similar looking works, and some artists will blatantly copy other artists.
The last situation is one which causes many in the community some concern.
Deliberate copying can take many forms; direct tracing, painting over, referencing, redrawing, using similar scenes in photography, making a similar skin, using the same stock resources to produce a similar work.
Regardless of how its done copying is looked down upon by many here on deviantART as unoriginal, a cheap shortcut, as cheating, as a form of theft, and when it involves a fandom it tends to be viewed as a cheap and guaranteed way to get popular with little actual effort.
While all of this is true to a certain extent it is also true that the various forms of copying are a completely valid learning tool which is practiced primarily by beginning artists and, quite frankly, those artists who lack the experience and training to compose completely original scenes and themes from scratch.
It is the task of CEA to balance these two concerns without condemning or defending one side or the other.
We understand that some segments of the community will always condemn the behavior while others who practice it will refuse to give it up and while the middle ground which we seek to hold will most likely not make everyone happy we believe that it is the best position available which will allow us to assist artists in enforcing their creative rights while not having to turn away those who are not able to meet some arbitrary test of originality.
To this end current deviantART policy attempts to strike a balance between tolerating a certain level of duplication while making certain that the rights of original artists are supported.
The current policy is as follows;
Reproduction of Existing Works by Any Method
Situations listed under the heading of Not Tolerated will override the situations listed under Usually Tolerated
Not Tolerated
Reproduction is misrepresented as being something other than a copy of an existing work.
The reproduction exactly duplicates an original work and the owner of the original work files a complaint.
The reproduction targets a stock resource and violates one or more of the Terms and Conditions for use.
The reproduction actually contains elements of the original (i.e. photo showing through paintover).
Usually Tolerated
The reproduction has been posted into a Fan Art Gallery.
The reproduction has been posted into the Scrapbook area.
The reproduction targets an element of pop culture (i.e. Anime screenshots or official video game content).
The reproduction properly credits the original.
Normally Tolerated
The reproduction obviously copies an existing work but possesses noticeable and substantial differences.
The reproduction obviously copies an existing work but is noticeably deficient in quality.
The reproduction and the original bare only vague or broad resemblances to each other (i.e. poses, etc).
It is important to note that the only two areas where copied works are deemed acceptable are the Scrapbook and the various Fan Art galleries. The deviantART staff reserves the right to relocate any copied works which are found residing elsewhere without prior notice.
Devious Comments
--
Director of Community Operations
deviantART, Inc.
---
Sunlight coming through the haze.
--
[link]
Pisanie poprawną polszczyzną daje ci +5 do lansu.
--
"Life without friends is a soda with absolutely no bubbles."
Good thing I like my soda flat.
You're quite right that there are going to be poeple who will be pissed, but you can't please them all.
Unfortunately, there's no way to prove that the original screen shot is still there and 'showing through' with an exactly traced vector screen shot.
There are also a lot of poeple who will be gloating on this one...*grin*
--
etsy shop
blog
flickr
twitter
The reproduction targets an element of pop culture (i.e. Anime screenshots or official video game content)."
Is there a reason why this is usually tolerated, seeing as it obviously falls under the category of "when it involves a fandom it tends to be viewed as a cheap and guaranteed way to get popular with little actual effort."?
And seeing as the toleration of uploading screenshots to dA can significantly change its function from an art-site to a photobucket/imageshack like bin of random stolen images?
--
Supporting and informing deviants near you
--
Sine Somnis, Sumus Nemo.
Although, what exactly is meant by "The reproduction targets an element of pop culture (i.e. Anime screenshots or official video game content)"
That's the only line I find to be a little vague.(or it's just me, which would make sense too.)
And why it's usually tolerated?
Although I wish the vector issue, which many are angry about, would have been completely addressed.
Mostly concerning certain indiviuals who do nothing but completely vector over the original screenshots, so it's basically exact copies.
But over-all I think this will be very helpful.
--
"Your face reminds me of something so safe, so harmless. If I was someone paranoid, I'd think you were a serial murderer, but the one who gains your confidence to harvest testicles."-~PaxtonMan
There is still a grey area with "an exact duplicate" but that grey area would exist just the same if you had simple stated "duplicate"; the final decision will thus sit with the policy team.
It is clear that a great deal of time and effort is put into reviewing and formulating the policies used to govern the site, and I can imagine that it isn't the most thankful job either
Well done to the whole policy team and my sincere thanks for keeping it fair and balanced for all.
--
That's right children - Pillage, THEN Burn!
Technically this kind of person doesn't exist. Everyone can compose an original scene from scratch. They may not be able to do a good job of it, it may not look near as good as they want it to, but they can do it. I'm also confused as to how tracing with a mouse (vector work or those things that try to pass themselves off as dolls) would help one learn to draw.
The reproduction exactly duplicates an original work and the owner of the original work files a complaint.
Does this mean we should track down the original artist rather than report it? Also what if they don't have a deviantart account and you don't know how to contact them?
It is important to note that the only two areas where copied works are deemed acceptable are the Scrapbook and the various Fan Art galleries.
I honestly have no problem with traces in scraps and while I'm still saddened by their allowance in the fan art galleries I also know there's nothing I can do. What about traced doll bases though? Every one that I've reported has come back invalid even though they weren't in either of those categories.
--
Being a gay man involves too much penis.
--
SCIENCE WILL HELP LESBIANISM - =OuroborosCobra
Although I am still a little bothered by the fact that making something a "fan art" seems to escape the "not tolerated" rule to a degree. But I do find it fair to balance it out with allowing "not tolerated" to override "usually tolerated".
--
Have an issue with a Daily Deviation?
DEVIANCE-ZINE .
Faith in Humanity:
I'ma just sit back and watch the drama unfold now. *grabs popcorn*
--
....and then there was soup.
[link] <-- Go. Now.
Previous Page12345... Next Page