This article is dedicated to the overwhelming negative response to
CEA UPDATE 20090130; Issues Involving Copying.
Before I begin my stance on this issue, I am well aware of the majority's opinion (at least everyone who has openly expressed theirs) regarding direct tracing i.e. superimposing a layer or sheet over an original image and copying it. This is the most basic form of tracing and is frowned upon- with good reason! But what I believe is causing the most commotion, and confusion, is understanding (and accepting) what practices fall into the category of tracing and the gravity of each one.
SimilarityIt's impossible to peruse all of deviantART's submissions and determine exactly what is original, derivative and/or an all-out imitation. If you've ever browsed the Pin-Up gallery (with its signature poses) or done definitive searches, you have undoubtedly come across a pile of near-identical images. Such marked similarity with sometimes little to no deviation makes it even harder to discern what is original or copied.
Growth and GuidanceI refuse to believe that no one here has ever tried to emulate the style of an artist they admire. It's so common that it's widely accepted as a phase artists go through at least once while they develop their own style. Every artist has a mentor or someone they look up to. The result of this is work that reflects elements of the works of those we admire- be it in colors, styles, poses, etc.
Personal ExperienceThere are countless rejections on
CEA UPDATE 20090130; Issues Involving Copying and hateful comments but I've yet to see one mentioning any instance of an actual incident involving their
ownwork and an accused party. There are, however, countless jabs at instances involving
fan art and an accused party who coincidentally happens to be very popular- which brings me to my next, and last, concern.
Popularity and CheatingTruly brilliant artwork will always shine brightest among those that were traced or made by other ill methods. If cheaters and tracers really are as worthless as you say they are, then why are you treating them as if they were a threat to your presence here on deviantART?
Worrying about possible incidents just makes it harder to control what already was from the beginning, given all the composites of cheating, justification and proof.
My last piece of advice is to simply
do what you do, and do it well.
Devious Comments
And there's people who love to vector, although too many times it is done poorly. (the same pen thickness everywhere? What kind of terrible inker are you??)
--
"For I am kind..."
I've read many reasonable statements but we have to be realistic regarding what can and cannot be achieved via moderation alone. deviantART can address what is wrong and try to devise a system to regulate it. deviantART is not, however, capable of defining the moral fiber of a 14-year-old to prevent him/her from copying the work of a 30-year-old. Meaning, it will happen anyway and the best (and most) dA can do is try to play the middle man amidst all the commotion.
--
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" - John Lennon
as for why get mad at cheaters , i think true artists understand the sacrifices that an artists endures for his/her craft like not going to that party because a painting is due in a week or not buying that new game because we need it for oils and canvases so when cheaters take and claim it to be theirs is an insult to every artists.
--
AM I COOL YET?
you just read a whole article and commented on it though
--
Im a bomb technician if you see me running then run faster.
Virginity like bubble, one prick and gone
--
Im a bomb technician if you see me running then run faster.
Virginity like bubble, one prick and gone
I also agree that the worst part is claiming it's anything other than copying.
I strive to do just that. Well said.
--
Visit my Gallery & Blogs!
Sketchbook
Lessons in Oil Painting
Previous Page1234 Next Page