recently i was set a task to photograph a selection of women wearing 1940's to 1950's clothing and underwear... and it was with this that i got into a row with my mother because she was sure that the photographs that i took bore to much flesh in some parts and they verging on porn; its safe to say that she is a non believer that artistic nudes are art and not porn.
it was because of this that i decided that i should go on a tiny little adventure to search out images that really where artistic in thier own right, though through doing this i did find that many people forget about artistic quality and ruin what could have been an amazing image by just snapping a photo which in its own right looks smutty and there are just breast's etc in the photo for no real reason... although if you do this your views will go up by the hundreds.
i am also certainly not saying that you cant have an image with full frontal nudety, infact i found some pretty amazing images where nothing was covered up.
i bet now your wondering where this is going? well here i will now showcase some of my images in two sections:
the covered up beauty
and
the un-covered beauty
thus hopefully proving that you can have strong images without the nipples ... though if produced and thought about carefully then nipples are always more then welcome...(and for those thinking ive been sexist (sp) then replace nipples with penis.
so here goes.

the covered beauty
(here im hoping to prove my point that you can have blistereingly hot images without the need for full frontal)











the un-covered beauty
(if your desperate for a bif to pure non covered nudety then maybe these guys and gals will inpire you)







please remember that these thoughts and expressions are entireley my own and not that of deviant art or any other counterparts. agree or disagree?? well i dont mind... i may just be getting to old before my time.