Note: this is NOT a shot against people who autograph their work in an undistracting manner. Putting your name somewhere in there, or having a little symbol like my TP thing, is perfectly fine.
I've been part of the DeviantArt community for three years now, and in that time I've met a lot of - I'm not gonna sugarcoat it - jerks. You're probably thinking "somebody said mean things about his art." Nope, that's not what this is about. This rant goes out to all you people who absolutely DEMAND that they get asked for their work to be used by every single person who uses it, in every single instance, for any possible reason, ever.
Get over yourselves.
I wasn't going to say anything, but then I was browsing a DA page owned by s/he who will remain nameless, and I found a link to
this page in a fairly decent sized banner centered across the top of his/her journal. The banner was simple: "UNAUTHORIZED USE OF ANY OF THIS ART IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED." One part of that linked page in particular REALLY irritated me: "'AUTHOR UNKNOWN' MEANS 'I STOLE IT'" That's just... WOW, I didn't know such pretentiousness could exist.
I ask you people who are so desperate to maintain some sort of autocratic dictatorship over your art: what are you really accomplishing here? If people want to use your art to make some silly little header on their Star Wars Angelfire fanpage, they're going to do it. All you do by posting massive warnings all over your journal and slapping enormous and distracting watermarks all over your art is make people dislike you, hate you, think you're a jerk, and/or not bother even looking at your art anymore. Let me tell you: when I look at a picture that I really like, but then fullview it and see that DeviantArt-generated watermark, that's it, goodbye. Not favoriting that, nor am I coming back. I assumed you drew that picture so other people could look at it, but since you apparently didn't, I'll just be on my way.
Also, what are you so afraid of? An 11 year old resizing your art in paint, blacking out your signature like it's a nipple slip on the news, and posting it on some Angelfire site they'll forget about in two weeks and will thus be deleted by Angelfire due to inactivity soon after? Ooooohhh, terrifying thought, that you weren't asked permission for that. What are you going to do, email the 11 year old and demand that he takes your work down? How is that going to make people want to appreciate you?
DeviantArt automatically gives you a copyright over your work, and gives you all those licenses to play with, so should the minuscule chance that someone actually tries to use your work to make money come to fruition, you'll be able to take legal action. And even THEN, think about it. Will Microsoft come to DeviantArt and try to steal your work to slather on their Windows 7 boxes as their new mascot? No. Maybe the 11 year old has a PayPal, puts it on his Angelfire, and some doof donates him 15 cents because your art brainwashed him. WOW, how can you sleep at night? You're out 15 cents. If you had that money you could make the down payment on that yacht.
Or ok, maybe someone puts your work on some shirts to sell at Sakura-Con, and maybe he makes maybe $30 profit once you take away the cost of the shirts and the printing. So what? You're angered by the fact that someone is profiting in some way off your work, but really, what are you really losing? Is preventing some idiot you will never meet from making some pocket change worth losing fans? You may think nobody would actually choose to not look at your work because of your watermarks, but yes, it does happen. I value my fans and the fact that they love looking at my work more than I value preventing someone I'll never meet from making a minuscule amount of money, but hey, that's just me.
DeviantArt is meant to be a fun community for people to come and share their work, original and fanart alike. Fanart is especially meant to be about the fun, community thing. In slapping on watermarks and posting huge banner warnings on your journal, you're killing everything DeviantArt is meant to be, as well as making yourself out to be a pompous, pretentious snob. Besides, fanart is using copyrighted characters without permission, which those copyright holders CAN get on you for if they deem your work is obscene or against what they stand for or whatever.
As for original work, as I said, DeviantArt issues you copyrights and licenses which you can utilize at will if someone tries to make money using your work. Why do you think nVidia doesn't slather watermarks all over the fairies and mermaids they decorate their video card boxes with? If anyone actually tries to profit on that work in any way that matters, lawyers to the rescue. And hey, if someone takes your picture and uploads it on their own DeviantArt page, all it takes is the submission date to prove who actually made it. So I'm telling you all now: Somewhere along the line someone got into your head and really screwed you up. Stop being paranoid and get back to what art was meant to be: a fun, carefree sharing of creativity, emotion, and passion. All you do with the watermarks and banner warnings is stave off a nonexistent threat and shoo away people who would otherwise like your work.
Devious Comments
--
Art isn't just a hobby, it's a way of life.
Come to my forum and chat about whatever!
Now all this article needs is a big copyright warning across the top.
--
*Marukomuru
[04:09:09] * %Marukomuru breaks into TtFaF
[04:09:14] <%Marukomuru> SO FAR AWAAAAAAAYYYYYEE
I do agree with you though, watermarks ruin so many good pictures...And so many people are so angry about nothing so much xP
--
Sketch Artist and Line Artist of Twin Fox Collab.
:iconAnthro-Fantasy-club: (I don\'t mean to advertise, it\'s just that they want me to post this in my signature...)
(besides, my manga is already copyrighted!)
--
You want evil? I'll SHOW you evil!
I really dont give a crap if someone takes one of my pictures and prints it on a shirt (more free advertising for me anyway) and it pisses me off to see people saying "you cant use this pic unless you ask me, not even as a reference"
soooo what if I look at a picture to get a pose right or something? it wouldnt have the same colours or background or anything, why should i bother credit you..
lol that may sound a bit mean but some people here are soo lame
--
Enter my contest-The Warmblood Classic [link]
>>> Aura Storm's Stables [link]
~HorseArt-RPG Special Breeds Organizer
--
Dinogaby is a *D/S shipper*
Visit and join my Clubs!
~DrDrakken-FanClub and ~Wicked-KP-Pairings
The watermarks always ruin the picture and then I'm all, "Well...I dunno if this is good or not because of your stupid big watermark that makes everything ugly."
--
"Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass, it is about learning how to dance in the rain."
- Because my work is mine and only mine, whatever its quality and my personnal utilization.
- Using without permission is not a compliment, it's theft.
- Because artists have the right to protect their work against thiefs.
With watermaks, thiefs can't say "Oh! I don't know you didn't want I use your work." So, no ambiguity about copyright.
- Because, if someone steals my work and uses it for commercial purposes, its market value is killed. Any firm want to use a design which was already used.
- DA, and more generally any place in Internet, doesn't protect at 100 % your work. Many artists here have had their work stolen.
So, every precautions are OK.
If you don't agree with using watermarkers it's your own opinion and be free to do what you want with your drawings. But, respect people who want more precautions for their work. It's not their problem if you find it ugly (and anyway, it's possible to do "pretty" watermarks).
Good continuation.
--
"Le silence, c'est la mort. Et toi, si tu parles, tu meurs. Si tu te tais, tu meurs. Alors, parles et meurs.", (Tahar DJAOUT).
I can understand why people would most certainly go all haywire when someone uses their work:
'I've spent my time and effort which has taken me weeks to complete, and some artistic-challenged punk goes off saying "I made this". That's bull****!'
or...
To have an artwork that one painstakingly made, taken, is like slapping you in the butt and setting your foot on fire.
But that's just from one perspective.
The other perspective is...ITS JUST A DRAWING! I'm not saying to just screw over artwork, really. (I love my artwork to death like any other artist.) But to fight to the death for one paper is most certainly not worth it.
Two different opinions. Which do I choose?
Honestly, I respect both sides of the argument. I agree with you, yet I disagree within the same degree.
An artist's artwork is like a reflection of one self. To have it 'stolen' is (in a way) a loss of pride. So I like using watermarks on my artwork every now and then.
However, since this is the internet, the minute you put that drawing up for show, you've acknowledged every precaution known to the human mind of what may happen to the picture done with one your own hand (...or hands if you're ambidextrous).
The fact is...
People's artworks are 'stolen' on a daily basis. This is a path that's inevitable, both on net and real life once shown to public.
So with my long a** response done...I like to watermark my artwork to show/protect my drawings in some sort of way, but if they get around the watermark and take it off...well...kudos. I can't do sh** to them; I'll just draw something else.
I created that drawing, ya? I can create something BETTER as time progresses, and thats something that people can never 'steal' from you: your passion and skill of creating art.
--
Next Kiriban: TBA
Previous Page123 Next Page