I don't normally write news articles. In fact, I don't do much on dA. I browse through the occasional gallery every now in then. But other than that, nothing.
However, I do spend a lot of time on dAmn. A lot of my time. Now, I've seen dAmn go through a lot of changes and most of them have made sense to me. However, this new update I've just found out about makes me want to rage.
I was sitting in one of my regular chatrooms and I was trying to brainstorm with the other users in there about a name for a chatroom based around music. After a ton of ideas, we finally came up with #Octave. So we checked and it didn't exist. So I went to go create it and was told that the name I chose was unavailable. So I tried a few times and decided to go into MNAdmin. I end up getting told that you can no longer create a chatroom if someone already signed up using that name. So because of ~
octave, someone who signed up 5 years ago and hasn't done ANYTHING since, I'm robbed of an awesome name. And it works vice versa.
t
Now, we all know how many people create chatrooms just sit. It's not as bad as how many people create usernames and do nothing, but it's a pretty huge number. People can never create usernames because someone used that name for a chatroom. I believe this is ridiculous.
Now, I asked the fine people in MNAdmin if it was a coding error and they told me it wasn't. In fact, they assured me the coders were brilliant. Now that's either bullshit, or they're very busy and dA can't find anyone else to code for them (This is bullshit, because I know people who would. For free.) because I still can't delete chatrooms I made from two years ago. Even the MNAdmin can't delete chatrooms, they can only make them so no one can join.
Now I don't know who comes up with these ideas but they really don't think about the end user when they come up with them. I personally believe that if they cared even a little bit about the community, they would work around it.
Devious Comments
--
The ashy grave the previous fire left is all that remains.
I completely agree. I understand that they do a lot of shit for us on this site, that they don't really have to do, but something like this is completely retarded, and they could at least try to work around it, as you said.
Bullshit it's for the groups, that's fucking retarded in my opinion, that's their fault they put groups/usernames in the same area.
--
HELLO I AM A MAC AND I AM A PC
--
#dAmnU Chat Ops Manager | King of #AMIPAnonymous | Co-Founder of #MasterPhotoshop
I'd have thought putting groups on a subdomain or in a sub folder would be easy enough, but it would most likely involve more work for developers. As we all know, doing less work is more fun. And you're probably right about there being people who would do it for free.
--
I kick, therefore I > #IdleRPG.
I am a founder of ~dAGamers. Have a look and join if you are a gamer!
The reservation of room names for a single room or user's own name is a convenience if anything, and allows for further expansion on the possibility of groups, such as simple group chats and the like. You're forgetting that overall, dAmn is not a priority on dA's development list, and any minor inconveniences for some will not impact the feature as a whole. Only a small percentage of any of dA's users ever use dAmn.
Of the rooms on dAmn, hardly any new ones ever take off, and if they do, it's easy enough to come up with a creative name. Most dAmn interaction occurs in either small, oddly named chats to begin with or in large, long lasting chats. Being unable to make a chat because of a user that doesn't use the name themselves, or is completely inactive, is a small setback.
Wouldn't you be somewhat bothered at all if someone made the channel #HasNoOxygen? Wouldn't it be misleading in some sense. Wouldn't you have wanted the chance to make it yourself?
dA is a fully scalable, highly expansive web application designed to accommodate a massive amount of user submitted content, they can't make every single feature work for every single one. Perhaps you should try focusing on the positives, rather than the negatives of this.
This needs to change.
--
Time to nut up or shut up
--
Oh bloody hell, now what?
Previous Page12345 Next Page